INFRINGEMENT AND THE REVERSE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS AFTER SCRIPPS V GENENTECH WHEN WILL YOU BE LIABLE FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

被引：0

|

作者：

GRIFFEN, SH ^{[1
]}

IRVING, TL ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER,WASHINGTON,DC 20005

来源：

ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY | 1992年 / 203卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

O6 [化学];

学科分类号：

0703 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：1 / BTEC

相关论文

共 6 条

[1] THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT
BLENKO, WJ
[J]. JOM-JOURNAL OF THE MINERALS METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY, 1990, 42 (05): : 59 - 59
[2] Patent infringement - The doctrine of equivalents revisited
Silverman, Arnold B.
[J]. JOM, 2006, 58 (12) : 72 - 72
[3] Patent infringement—the doctrine of equivalents revisited
Arnold B. Silverman
[J]. JOM, 2006, 58 : 72 - 72
[4] CHAL 53-The continuing saga of Madey v. Duke University: Holding universities liable for patent infringement
Hasford, Justin J.
[J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 232
[5] A guide to waiver after Echostar and Seagate:: When you raise the advice-of-counsel defense to willful patent infringement, what are you giving up?
Belden, Brett P.
[J]. WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW, 2007, (04) : 933 - 975
[6] AFTER BMC RESOURCES, INC. V. PAYMENTECH, L.P.: CONSPIRATORIAL INFRINGEMENT AS A MEANS OF HOLDING JOINT INFRINGERS LIABLE
Truong, Long
[J]. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2009, 103 (04) : 1897 - 1928