Development appraisal in practice: some evidence from the planning system

被引:20
|
作者
Coleman, Charlotte [1 ]
Crosby, Neil [2 ]
McAllister, Pat [3 ]
Wyatt, Pete [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Sch Real Estate & Planning, Reading RG6 6AW, Berks, England
[2] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Sch Real Estate & Planning, Real Estate, Reading RG6 6AW, Berks, England
[3] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Sch Real Estate & Planning, Real Estate Appraisal, Reading RG6 6AW, Berks, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
development; appraisal; UK; residual method; discounted cash flow;
D O I
10.1080/09599916.2012.750620
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Due to the requirement to demonstrate financial feasibility of policy proposals and scheme-specific planning obligations, development viability and development appraisal have become core themes in the English planning system. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the application of development appraisal in practice. The paper reviews the literature and the models available to assess the viability of development and analyses a sample 19 development viability appraisals to identify practice. The paper concludes that the practice of development appraisal deviates significantly from the tenets of capital budgeting theory. In particular, in addition to a propensity to oversimplify the timing of income and expenditure, the way in which debt, developer's return and value and cost change are handled in practice illustrates a major gap between mainstream capital budgeting theory and development appraisal in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 165
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fit for planning? An evaluation of the application of development viability appraisal models in the UK planning system
    Crosby, Neil
    McAllister, Pat
    Wyatt, Peter
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2013, 40 (01): : 3 - 22
  • [2] Fit for policy? Some evidence on the application of development viability models in the United Kingdom planning system
    McAllister, Patrick
    Wyatt, Peter
    Coleman, Charlotte
    [J]. TOWN PLANNING REVIEW, 2013, 84 (04): : 517 - 543
  • [3] CONTINUING EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE COMPETENCY THROUGH CRITICAL APPRAISAL SKILL DEVELOPMENT
    LaPetina, Allison
    Tran, Christine
    O'Shea, Debra
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2021, 48 (02)
  • [4] Evidence-based Practice: A Critical Appraisal
    Ilott, Irene
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 19 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [5] SOME EVIDENCE OF THE INFLUENCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES ON SURGICAL PRACTICE
    GLENN, WWL
    [J]. SURGERY, 1958, 43 (04) : 688 - 698
  • [6] Development-led planning practices in a plan-led planning system: empirical evidence from Finland
    Valtonen, Eero
    Falkenbach, Heidi
    Viitanen, Kauko
    [J]. EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2017, 25 (06) : 1053 - 1075
  • [7] The Polish Practice of Probabilistic Approach in Power System Development Planning
    Przygrodzki, Maksymilian
    Kubek, Pawel
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [8] The compatibility of performance appraisal systems with TQM principles - evidence from current practice
    Soltani, E
    van der Meer, R
    Williams, TM
    Lai, PC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 26 (1-2) : 92 - 112
  • [9] Sustainable development in American planning A critical appraisal
    Staley, Samuel R.
    [J]. TOWN PLANNING REVIEW, 2006, 77 (01): : 99 - 126
  • [10] Participatory Rural Appraisal in Deliberations of Development Planning
    Mustanir, Ahmad
    Lubis, Sandi
    Barisan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEMOCRACY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE (ICODAG 2017), 2017, 163 : 316 - 319