FDG PET for the Detection of Bone Metastases: Sensitivity, Specificity and Comparison with Other Imaging Modalities

被引：8
|
作者：
Costelloe, Colleen M. [1 ]
Chuang, Hubert H. [2 ]
Madewell, John E. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Div Diagnost Imaging, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Div Diagnost Imaging, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源：
PET CLINICS | 2010年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词：
FDG; PET; Bone; Metastases;
D O I：
10.1016/j.cpet.2010.04.001
中图分类号：
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要：
A literature review was performed of studies reporting sensitivity and specificity of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2010. PET was found to have higher sensitivity for the detection of osseous metastases when compared to CT, skeletal scintigraphy, whole body MRI and combined conventional imaging modalities. A potential exception is when comparing PET with bone scan in the setting of blastic metastases. PET may be a better indicator of active bony metastases. The efficacy of PET can be increased with fused anatomic imaging. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：281 / 295
页数：15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of imaging with FDG PET/CT with other imaging modalities in myeloma
    Richard J. Breyer
    Michael E. Mulligan
    Stacy E. Smith
    Bruce R. Line
    Ashraf Z. Badros
    Skeletal Radiology, 2006, 35 : 632 - 640
  • [2] Comparison of imaging with FDG PET/CT with other imaging modalities in myeloma
    Breyer, Richard J., III
    Mulligan, Michael E.
    Smith, Stacy E.
    Line, Bruce R.
    Badros, Ashraf Z.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 35 (09) : 632 - 640
  • [3] Detection of bone metastases: Assessment of integrated FDG PET/CT imaging
    Taira, Al V.
    Herfkens, Robert J.
    Gambhir, Sam S.
    Quon, Andrew
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (01) : 204 - 211
  • [4] Comparison of FDG PET and SPECT for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer
    Uematsu, T
    Yuen, S
    Yukisawa, S
    Aramaki, T
    Morimoto, N
    Endo, M
    Furukawa, H
    Uchida, Y
    Watanabe, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) : 1266 - 1273
  • [5] Comparison of FDG-PET, bone scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of osseous metastases
    Sam, JW
    Yun, M
    Alnafisi, N
    Lacorte, LB
    Jang, S
    Alavi, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (08): : 1102 - 1102
  • [6] FDG PET and other imaging modalities for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases: A meta-analysis
    Pan, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 : S329 - S329
  • [7] FDG PET and other imaging modalities for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases: A meta-analysis
    Pan, LingLing
    Huang, Gang
    Han, Yuan
    Liu, JianJun
    Sun, XiaoGuang
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50
  • [8] Superiority of 18F-FNa PET/CT for Detecting Bone Metastases in Comparison with Other Diagnostic Imaging Modalities
    Lapa, Paula
    Saraiva, Tiago
    Silva, Rodolfo
    Marques, Margarida
    Costa, Gracinda
    Lima, Joao Pedroso
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2017, 30 (01): : 53 - 60
  • [9] Comparison of FDG PET and bone scans in the evaluation of bone metastases
    Vu, TT
    Gayed, IW
    Macapinlac, HA
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 196 - 196
  • [10] Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer
    Hahn, Steffen
    Heusner, Till
    Kuemmel, Sherko
    Koeninger, Angelika
    Nagarajah, James
    Mueller, Stefan
    Boy, Christian
    Forsting, Michael
    Bockisch, Andreas
    Antoch, Gerald
    Stahl, Alexander
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2011, 52 (09) : 1009 - 1014
12345