TESTING BETWEEN ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF CHOICE UNDER UNCERTAINTY - COMMENT

被引:13
|
作者
QUIGGIN, J
机构
[1] Department of Economics, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601
关键词
RANK-DEPENDENT EXPECTED UTILITY; ALTERNATIVE CHOICE MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/BF01065356
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Battaglio, Kagel, and Jiranyakul use experimental tests to compare rank-dependent expected utility (RDEU), regret theory, prospect theory, and Machina's generalized smooth preferences model. They conclude that none of these models consistently organizes the data. The purpose of this note is to point out that RDEU theory was tested in combination with a hypothesis on the choice of functional form that has been explicitly rejected by the original author of the model (Quiggin, 1982, 1987). When the original form of RDEU theory is tested, it performs quite well.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 164
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条