EFFECTS OF A PREPAID NONMONETARY INCENTIVE ON RESPONSE RATES AND RESPONSE QUALITY IN A FACE-TO-FACE SURVEY

被引:46
|
作者
WILLIMACK, DK [1 ]
SCHUMAN, H [1 ]
PENNELL, BE [1 ]
LEPKOWSKI, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN,SURVEY RES CTR,INST SOCIAL RES,FIELD SECT,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
关键词
D O I
10.1086/269459
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
We conducted a randomized experiment on a face-to-face interview survey in order to test the effects on response rates of a prepaid nonmonetary incentive. Results showed a statistically significant increase in response rates, mostly through reduction in refusal rates, in the half sample that received the incentive (a gift-type ballpoint pen) as compared with a no incentive control group. The effect appears to be due to greater cooperation from incentive recipients at the initial visit by an interviewer. Unexpectedly, the incentive group also showed a significantly higher rate of sample ineligibility, possibly due to easier identification of vacant residences or nonexistent addresses. In addition, evidence suggests greater response completeness among responding incentive recipients early in the interview, with no evidence of increased measurement error due to the incentive.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 92
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RESPONSE RATES AND RESPONSE CONTENT IN MAIL VERSUS FACE-TO-FACE SURVEYS
    KRYSAN, M
    SCHUMAN, H
    SCOTT, LJ
    BEATTY, P
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1994, 58 (03) : 381 - 399
  • [2] Respondent Incentives in a National Face-to-face Survey: Do They Affect Response Quality?
    Grauenhorst, Thomas
    Blohm, Michael
    Koch, Achim
    [J]. FIELD METHODS, 2016, 28 (03) : 266 - 283
  • [3] FACE-TO-FACE ADVANCE CONTACT AND MONETARY INCENTIVES EFFECTS ON MAIL SURVEY RETURN RATES, RESPONSE DIFFERENCES, AND SURVEY COSTS
    BELLIZZI, JA
    HITE, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1986, 14 (01) : 99 - 106
  • [4] Prepaid monetary incentives and data quality in face-to-face interviews
    Davern, M
    Rockwood, TH
    Sherrod, R
    Campbell, S
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2003, 67 (01) : 139 - 147
  • [5] Prepaid monetary incentive effects on mail survey response
    Jobber, D
    Saunders, J
    Mitchell, VW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2004, 57 (04) : 347 - 350
  • [6] Prepaid monetary incentive effects on mail survey response
    Jobber, D
    Saunders, J
    Mitchell, VW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2004, 57 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [7] ARE INCENTIVE EFFECTS ON RESPONSE RATES AND NONRESPONSE BIAS IN LARGE-SCALE, FACE-TO-FACE SURVEYS GENERALIZABLE TO GERMANY? EVIDENCE FROM TEN EXPERIMENTS
    Pforr, Klaus
    Blohm, Michael
    Blom, Annelies G.
    Erdel, Barbara
    Felderer, Barbara
    Fraessdorf, Mathis
    Hajek, Kristin
    Helmschrott, Susanne
    Kleinert, Corinna
    Koch, Achim
    Krieger, Ulrich
    Kroh, Martin
    Martin, Silke
    Sassenroth, Denise
    Schmiedeberg, Claudia
    Truedinger, Eva-Maria
    Rammstedt, Beatrice
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2015, 79 (03) : 740 - 768
  • [8] Use of Monetary Incentives in Face-to-Face Surveys in Light of Decreasing Response Rates
    Pforr, Klaus
    Rammstedt, Beatrice
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPIE PSYCHOSOMATIK MEDIZINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 2016, 66 (07) : 280 - 282
  • [9] Email subject lines and response rates to invitations to participate in a web survey and a face-to-face interview: the sound of silence
    Sappleton, Natalie
    Lourenco, Fernando
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2016, 19 (05) : 611 - 622
  • [10] Effects of face-to-face confrontation with another individual on the physiological response to sounds
    Asakura, Takumi
    [J]. APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2023, 213