EFFECTS OF FOLIAR METHANOL APPLICATIONS ON CROP YIELD

被引:14
|
作者
ALBRECHT, SL [1 ]
DOUGLAS, CL [1 ]
KLEPPER, EL [1 ]
RASMUSSEN, PE [1 ]
RICKMAN, RW [1 ]
SMILEY, RW [1 ]
WILKINS, DE [1 ]
WYSOCKI, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] COLUMBIA BASIN AGR RES CTR, PENDLETON, OR 97801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500060021x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Recent reports indicate that vegetative growth and yield of C-3 crops are enhanced by foliar methanol application and that overall crop water use was reduced by methanol sprays. It has been suggested that methanol may act as a C source for the plant and a photorespiration inhibitor. Field experiments were conducted near Pendleton, OR, during 1993 and 1994 to determine if foliar methanol applications would increase crop growth and yield in the dryland agroecosystems common to the Pacific Northwest. Methanol solutions (200 or 400 mL L(-1) with a surfactant) were applied to winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), spring wheat, spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) at several plant growth stages. Phytotoxic symptoms were observed only with the highest concentration of methanol. No significant response, either beneficial or detrimental, to methanol application was found In any crop. No differences were found in stomatal conductance or leaf specific weight between any methanol treatment and the controls. Methanol applications did not significantly increase crop growth or yield. We concluded that methanol applications will not benefit grain and pea production in the northwestern USA.
引用
收藏
页码:1642 / 1646
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of foliar methanol applications on yield of bread wheat cultivars grown under field conditions
    Ekiz, H
    Bagci, SA
    Kiral, AS
    [J]. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1996, 24 (03) : 369 - 375
  • [2] Effect of foliar applications of methanol on growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
    Hernández, LF
    Pellegrini, CN
    Malla, LM
    [J]. PHYTON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2000, 66 : 1 - 8
  • [3] Residual effects of nitrogen fertilization on foliar chlorophyll and yield of the succeeding rice crop
    Moradi, F
    Alejar, AA
    Peng, S
    Visperas, RM
    [J]. PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST, 2002, 85 (04): : 343 - 349
  • [4] Effects of row spacing and potassium foliar applications on yield of cotton
    Menefee, Dorothy
    Smith, Douglas R.
    Zwonitzer, Martha
    Collins, Harold P.
    [J]. AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 6 (04)
  • [5] Foliar methanol applications to cotton in the southeastern United States: Leaf physiology, growth, and yield components
    vanIersel, MW
    Heitholt, JJ
    Wells, R
    Oosterhuis, DM
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1995, 87 (06) : 1157 - 1160
  • [6] FOLIAR APPLICATION OF SILICON ON YIELD COMPONENTS OF WHEAT CROP
    Martin, Thomas Newton
    Nunes, Ubirajara Russi
    Leivas Stecca, Jessica Deolinda
    Pahins, Diogenes Barella
    [J]. REVISTA CAATINGA, 2017, 30 (03) : 578 - 585
  • [7] Effects of foliar applications of carbohydrates on the yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) lint
    Hedin, PA
    McCarty, JC
    Dollar, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1997, 45 (07) : 2763 - 2767
  • [8] Effects of Foliar and Root Applications of Methanol on the Growth of Arabidopsis, Tobacco, and Tomato Plants
    Ingrid Ramírez
    Fernando Dorta
    Valeria Espinoza
    Edra Jiménez
    Ana Mercado
    Hugo Peña-Cortés
    [J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2006, 25 : 30 - 44
  • [9] Effects of foliar and root applications of methanol on the growth of Arabidopsis, tobacco, and tomato plants
    Ramírez, I
    Dorta, F
    Espinoza, V
    Jiménez, E
    Mercado, A
    Peña-Cortés, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2006, 25 (01) : 30 - 44
  • [10] Effects of the foliar application of methanol on the yield and growth of rice (Oryza sativa cv. Shiroudi)
    Abbasian, Abouzar
    Mirshekari, Bahram
    Vishekaei, Mohammad N. Safarzade
    Rashidi, Varahram
    Aminpanah, Hashem
    [J]. CIENCIA E INVESTIGACION AGRARIA, 2016, 43 (01): : 17 - 24