CLIMATE POLICY OUTCOMES IN GERMANY Environmental Performance and Environmental Damage in Eleven Policy Areas

被引:1
|
作者
Karapin, Roger [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunter Coll, Polit Sci, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Ctr, New York, NY USA
来源
GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY | 2012年 / 30卷 / 03期
关键词
climate policy; environmental policy; environmental outcomes; German unification; greenhouse gases; green parties; renewable energy; ecological tax reform;
D O I
10.3167/gps.2012.300301
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Germany has reduced its emissions of greenhouse gases more than almost any other industrialized democracy and is exceeding its ambitious Kyoto commitment. Hence, it is commonly portrayed as a climate-policy success story, but the situation is actually much more complex. Generalizing Germany's per-capita emissions to all countries or its emissions reductions to all industrialized democracies would still very likely produce more than a two-degree rise in global temperature. Moreover, analyzing the German country-case into eleven subcases shows that it is a mixture of relative successes and failures. This analysis leads to three main conclusions. First, high relative performance and high environmental damage can coexist. Second, we should see national cases in a differentiated way and not only in terms of their aggregate performances. Third, researchers on climate policies should more often begin with outcomes, work backward to policies, and be prepared for some surprises. Ironically, the most effective government interventions may not be explicit climate policies, such as the economic transformation of eastern Germany. Moreover, the lack of policy-making in certain areas may undercut progress made elsewhere, including unregulated increases in car travel, road freight, and electricity consumption. Research on climate and environmental policies should focus on somewhat different areas of government intervention and ask different questions.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 34
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Climate policy, environmental performance, and profits
    Tommy Lundgren
    Per-Olov Marklund
    [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2015, 44 : 225 - 235
  • [2] Climate policy, environmental performance, and profits
    Lundgren, Tommy
    Marklund, Per-Olov
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2015, 44 (03) : 225 - 235
  • [3] Industry, environmental policy, and environmental outcomes
    Press, Daniel
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2007, 32 (32) : 317 - 344
  • [4] Geography and climate policy: a comparative assessment of new environmental policy instruments in the UK and Germany
    Bailey, I
    Rupp, S
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2005, 36 (03) : 387 - 401
  • [5] Market environmentalism, new environmental policy instruments, and climate policy in the United Kingdom and Germany
    Bailey, Ian
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2007, 97 (03) : 530 - 550
  • [6] The climate for change in environmental policy
    Brooks, DE
    Bersell, SD
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 1995, 14 (04): : N5 - N6
  • [7] Preface: Climate Change and Environmental Policy
    Madhu Khanna
    Haroon Kheshgi
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2004, 9 (4) : 311 - 313
  • [8] Environmental permitting as a climate policy instrument
    Gaio, Alexandre
    Rosner, Raquel Frazao
    Ferreira, Vivian M.
    [J]. DIREITO E PRAXIS, 2023, 14 (01): : 594 - 620
  • [9] Perception and performance in environmental policy
    Bandelow, Nils C.
    Hornung, Johanna
    Schroeder, Ilana
    [J]. REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 2024, 41 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [10] Negotiation-based Policy Instruments and Performance: Dutch Covenants and Environmental Policy Outcomes
    Bressers, Hans
    de Bruijn, Theo
    Lulofs, Kris
    O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2011, 31 (02) : 187 - 208