Comparison of high-dose Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy and Cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy for p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the context of revised HPV-based staging

被引:6
|
作者
Bhattasali, Onita [1 ]
Thompson, Lester D. R. [2 ]
Abdalla, Iman A. [3 ]
Chen, Jergin [1 ]
Iganej, Shawn [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Angeles Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, 4950 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Woodland Hills Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, 5601 Soto Ave, Woodland Hills, CA USA
[3] Los Angeles Med Ctr, Dept Hematol Oncol, Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, 1515 North Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; High-dose cisplatin; Cetuximab; p16-positive; Radiation therapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.rpor.2018.08.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: To perform a comparison of Cisplatin vs. Cetuximab in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in the context of the revised HPV-based staging. Background: Previous reports comparing these agents in head and neck cancer have included heterogenous disease and p16-status. Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted from 2006 to 2016 of patients with p16-positive OPSCC who underwent definitive radiotherapy concurrent with either triweekly Cisplatin (n=251.) or Cetuximab (n=40). AJCC 8th Edition staging was adapted. Results: Median follow-up for surviving patients was 40 months. On multivariate analysis for all-comers, comparing Cisplatin and Cetuximab, 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR): 6% vs. 16% (p = 0.07), 3-year distant metastasis (DM): 8% vs. 21% (p = 0.04), 3-year overall recurrence rate (ORR): 11% vs. 29% (p = 0.01), and 3-year cause-specific survival (CSS): 94% vs. 79% (p = 0.06), respectively. On stage-based subgroup analysis, for stage I-II disease, 3-year LRR: 5% vs. 10% (p = 0.51), 3-year DM: 7% vs. 16% (p = 0.32), 3-year ORR: 10% vs. 23% (p = 0.15), and 3-year CSS: 95% vs. 82% (p = 0.38). For stage III disease, 3-year LRR: 10% vs. 40% (p = 0.07), 3-year DM: 9% vs. 43% (p = 0.07), 3-year ORR: 15% vs. 55% (p = 0.04), and 3-year CSS: 94% vs. 57% (p = 0.048). Conclusions: When given concurrently with radiotherapy, Cetuximab and triweekly Cisplatin demonstrated comparable efficacy for AJCC 8th Edition stage I-II p16-positive OPSCC. However, Cetuximab appeared to be associated with higher rates of treatment failure and cancer-related deaths in stage III disease. Upon availability of the RTOG 1016 trial results, analysis based on the revised HPV-based staging should be performed to confirm these findings. (C) 2018 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 457
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy trumps cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy in p16/HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers
    Monali Swain
    Tejpal Gupta
    Sadhana Kannan
    JaiPrakash Agarwal
    [J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019, 276 : 2111 - 2112
  • [2] Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy trumps cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy in p16/HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers
    Swain, Monali
    Gupta, Tejpal
    Kannan, Sadhana
    Agarwal, JaiPrakash
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 276 (07) : 2111 - 2112
  • [3] Concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy versus cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy for p16-positive, locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Suton, P.
    Skelin, M.
    Luksic, I.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [4] In HPV-associated Oropharyngeal Cancer, Cisplatin-based Chemoradiotherapy is superior to Cetuximab-based Bioradiotherapy in Terms of Overall Survival
    Semrau, Sabine
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (05) : 447 - 449
  • [5] Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy vs. cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy for p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer: an updated meta-analysis including trials RTOG 1016 and De-ESCALaTE
    Petar Suton
    Marko Skelin
    Zoran Rakusic
    Stjepan Dokuzovic
    Ivica Luksic
    [J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019, 276 : 1275 - 1281
  • [6] Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy vs. cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy for p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer: an updated meta-analysis including trials RTOG 1016 and De-ESCALaTE
    Suton, Petar
    Skelin, Marko
    Rakusic, Zoran
    Dokuzovic, Stjepan
    Luksic, Ivica
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 276 (05) : 1275 - 1281
  • [7] Concurrent Cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy versus Cisplatin-based Chemoradiotherapy in the Definitive Management of Favourable Biology Human Papillomavirus-associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Swain, M.
    Kannan, S.
    Srinivasan, S.
    Agarwal, J. P.
    Gupta, T.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 34 (12) : 786 - 795
  • [8] Cetuximab-Based Bioradiation Therapy Versus Cisplatin-Based Chemoradiation Therapy in the Definitive Treatment of Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Bhattasali, O.
    Iganej, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : S82 - S83
  • [9] Survival Outcomes for p16-positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Human Papillomavirus Status
    Robinson, S. D.
    Towler, J. D.
    Kitson, R.
    Saleh, D.
    Younan, H-C.
    Mukhopadhyay, S.
    Weir, J.
    Gujral, D. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (12)
  • [10] Which Patients Benefit from Prophylactic Gastrostomy Tube in p16-positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiation with High-Dose Cisplatin?
    Beard, B. W.
    Bhattasali, O.
    Iganej, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 106 (05): : 1205 - 1206