Germany and its Military Involvement in the Kosovo Crisis: The End of Civilian Power?

被引:0
|
作者
Kriz, Zdenek [1 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Dept Int Relat & European Studies, Brno, Czech Republic
关键词
civilian power; Germany; Kosovo;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The concept of civilian power assumes that a civilizing process takes place in international relations. This process is typical of the development of the formulation and implementation of universally binding principles which regulate relations among states, establish a monopoly on the legitimate use of force on the international level, try to minimize violence, promote the development of democratic political structures of participation and attempt to reduce economic and social differences. Germany is thought to be one of two typical civilian powers (the other one is Japan). German participation in the NATO 1999 war against Yugoslavia cannot be simply interpreted as the end of German policy based on the civilian power concept because many features of civilian power were present in the German foreign policy dealing with the Kosovo crisis. On the other hand the main problem is that simultaneously German participation in war against Yugoslavia does not allow us simply to accept Maull's conclusion that there was no deviation from the political strategy of a civilian power. As a result, this event is a challenge for proponents of the civilian power concept because it has shown the weaknesses of this concept and the necessity to make it more precise. Unfortunately, proponents of the civilian power concept have not taken up this challenge yet. The prevailing explanation seems to be unsatisfactory.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 130
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Germany's foreign policy, post-Kosovo: still a'Civilian Power'?
    Maull, HW
    [J]. GERMANY AS A CIVILIAN POWER?: THE FOREIGN POLICY OF THE BERLIN REPUBLIC, 2001, : 106 - 127
  • [2] MILITARY PROFESSIONALIZATION AND CRISIS OF RETURNING POWER TO CIVILIAN REGIMES OF WEST-AFRICA
    AKIWOWO, A
    [J]. ARMED FORCES & SOCIETY, 1977, 3 (04) : 643 - 654
  • [3] RELATION OF CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PSYCHIATRY IN CRISIS SITUATIONS
    DRAYER, CS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1952, 109 (04): : 259 - 261
  • [4] Military and Civilian Collaboration: The Power of Numbers
    Stinner, Daniel J.
    Wenke, Joseph C.
    Ficke, James R.
    Gordon, Wade
    Toledano, James
    Carlini, Anthony R.
    Scharfstein, Daniel O.
    MacKenzie, Ellen J.
    Bosse, Michael J.
    Hsu, Joseph R.
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 2017, 182 : 10 - 17
  • [5] Germany at Maastricht: power politics or Civilian Power?
    Frenkler, U
    [J]. GERMANY AS A CIVILIAN POWER?: THE FOREIGN POLICY OF THE BERLIN REPUBLIC, 2001, : 26 - 48
  • [6] Hazardous Events and Accident Involvement by Military and Civilian Pilots
    Hunter, David R.
    Stewart, John E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02): : 123 - 134
  • [7] Today's civilian, military power conditioning
    Hovdestad, Jerry
    [J]. Electronic Products (Garden City, New York), 2008, 50 (03):
  • [8] Civil-military relations in the Kosovo crisis: An emerging hegemony?
    Pugh, M
    [J]. SECURITY DIALOGUE, 2000, 31 (02) : 229 - 242
  • [9] Military and Civilian: Reconfiguring the End of Roman Britain in the North
    Petts, David
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY, 2013, 16 (02) : 314 - 335
  • [10] Military-civilian interactions: Intervening in humanitarian crisis.
    Rutherford, KR
    [J]. ARMED FORCES & SOCIETY, 2002, 28 (03) : 521 - 522