COMPARISON OF SELECTED LANDSCAPE ECOLOGICAL FOREST METRICS IN TWO DIFFERENT LANDSCAPE TYPES

被引:0
|
作者
Pirnat, Janez [1 ]
机构
[1] Biotehn Fak, Oddelek Gozdarstvo & Obnovlj Gozdne Vire, Ljubljana, Slovenia
来源
ACTA SILVAE ET LIGNI | 2015年 / 107期
关键词
landscape ecological indices; Fragstats; forests; diversity function;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
By analysing changes in landscape structure we can trace the influence they have on the evaluation of the diversity function of a forest. In the presented research, it was assessed which indices for computing areas, cores and aggregation tendencies that can be calculated with the Fragstats 4.2 programme best meet our needs, what limits they have and what we should pay special attention to. We considered differences in the resolution of incoming data and different rules for the calculation of raster cells. Both were compared for forests in two different landscape types: Kocevje and Slovenska Istra. The basic surface indices CA and PLAND proved to be the most suitable, while for more demanding purposes, AREA_ AM can be used as well. For the evaluation of core areas, basic indices proved to be the most suitable, too, specifically TCA and CPLAND. Other important indices were the index of the number of core areas per surface unit DCAD and indices CORE_ AM and DCORE_ AM for a more detailed spatial evaluation of core areas, whereas most useful for the evaluation of aggregation tendency proved to be the patch density index PD.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 34
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the effect of scale on the ability of landscape structure metrics to discriminate landscape types in Mediterranean forest districts
    Garcia-Feced, C.
    Saura, S.
    Elena-Rossello, R.
    [J]. FOREST SYSTEMS, 2010, 19 (02) : 129 - 140
  • [2] Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning
    Leitao, AB
    Ahern, J
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2002, 59 (02) : 65 - 93
  • [3] Scaling effects of landscape metrics: a comparison of two methods
    Lu, Yihe
    Feng, Xiaoming
    Chen, Liding
    Fu, Bojie
    [J]. PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 34 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [4] The adequacy of different landscape metrics for various landscape patterns
    Li, XZ
    He, HS
    Bu, RC
    Wen, QC
    Chang, Y
    Hu, YM
    Li, YH
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2005, 38 (12) : 2626 - 2638
  • [5] The comparison of landscape metrics in different scales - The raster and vector approaches
    Solon, J
    [J]. EKOLOGIA-BRATISLAVA, 2004, 23 : 320 - 332
  • [6] The effect of human-modified landscape structure on forest grouse broods in two landscape types
    Huhta, Esa
    Helle, Pekka
    Nivala, Vesa
    Nikula, Ari
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2017, 8 (09):
  • [7] The main types of vegetation and the constitution pattern of ecological landscape forest in Shenzhen city
    Feng, X.
    Lin, J.
    [J]. Changsha Dianli Xueyuan Xuebao/Journal of Changsha University of Electric Power, 2001, 16 (01): : 87 - 90
  • [8] Landscape metrics: A new tool for forest ecologists
    Diaz, NM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1996, 94 (12) : 12 - 16
  • [9] A comparison of landscape metrics for conservation planning
    Sundell-Turner, Nancy M.
    Rodewald, Amanda D.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2008, 86 (3-4) : 219 - 225
  • [10] LANDSCAPE PREFERENCE METRICS - AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON
    BUHYOFF, GJ
    WELLMAN, JD
    KOCH, NE
    GAUTHIER, L
    HULTMAN, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1983, 16 (02) : 181 - +