Production and maintenance performance analysis: manual versus semi-automatic LHDs

被引:19
|
作者
Gustafson, Anna [1 ]
Schunnesson, Hakan [1 ]
Galar, Diego [1 ]
Kumar, Uday [1 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Div Operat Maintenance & Acoust, Lulea, Sweden
关键词
KPI; Indicator; Productivity; Load haul dump (LHD); Automation; Maintenance; Underground mining; Data integration; Sweden; Performance management;
D O I
10.1108/13552511311304492
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and analyse the production and maintenance performance of a manual and a semi-automatic load haul dump ( LHD) machine to find similarities and differences. Design/methodology/approach - Real time process-, operational- and maintenance data, from an underground mine in Sweden, have been refined and aggregated into KPIs in order to make the comparison between the LHDs. Findings - The main finding is the demonstration of how production and maintenance data can be improved through information fusion, showing some unexpected results for maintenance of automatic and semi-automatic LHDs in the mining industry. It was found that up to one third of the manually entered workshop data are not consistent with the automatically recorded production times. It is found that there are similarities in utilization and filling rate but differences in produced tonnes/machine hour between the two machines. Originality/value - The originality in this paper is the information fusion between automatically produced production data and maintenance data which increases the accuracy of reliability analysis data. Combining the production indicator and the maintenance indicator gives a common tool to the production and maintenance departments. This paper shows the difference in both maintenance and production performance between a manual and semi-automatic LHD.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / +
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COUNTING AND SCORING THE CAPILLARIES: MANUAL VERSUS SEMI-AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS
    Sulli, A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2016, 75 : 8 - 8
  • [2] MANUAL ELLIPSOMETRY MADE SEMI-AUTOMATIC
    MELMED, AJ
    CARROLL, JJ
    [J]. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1978, 49 (09): : 1357 - 1358
  • [3] Comparison of Manual versus Semi-Automatic Segmentations of the Stenotic Carotid Artery Bifurcation
    Csippa, Benjamin
    Mihaly, Zsuzsanna
    Czinege, Zsofia
    Nemeth, Marton Bence
    Halasz, Gabor
    Paal, Gyorgy
    Sotonyi, Peter, Jr.
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (17):
  • [4] Semi-automatic Production Processes
    不详
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2020, 100 (02): : 52 - 52
  • [5] An evaluation of manual and semi-automatic laughter annotation
    Ludusan, Bogdan
    Wagner, Petra
    [J]. INTERSPEECH 2020, 2020, : 621 - 625
  • [6] Automatic, semi-automatic and manual validation of urban drainage data
    Branisavljevic, N.
    Prodanovic, D.
    Pavlovic, D.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 62 (05) : 1013 - 1021
  • [7] An interactive tool for manual, semi-automatic and automatic video annotation
    Bianco, Simone
    Ciocca, Gianluigi
    Napoletano, Paolo
    Schettini, Raimondo
    [J]. COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2015, 131 : 88 - 99
  • [8] FLINTHAM,E - MANUAL SEMI-AUTOMATIC AND AUTOMATIC ARC WELDING
    JACKSON, E
    [J]. BRITISH WELDING JOURNAL, 1967, 14 (06): : 351 - &
  • [9] Comparison of Manual Vs. Semi-Automatic CBCT Image Analysis
    Claps, L.
    Alaei, P.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E556 - E556
  • [10] Ultrasonic defect sizing with manual and semi-automatic system
    Pitkänen, J
    Kauppinen, P
    Särkiniemi, P
    Jeskanen, H
    [J]. PLANT LIFE MANAGEMENT: PROGRESS FOR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, 2003, 227 : 51 - 61