German Air Travel Tax (ATT): No Lessons Learned from the Dutch Ticket Tax

被引:0
|
作者
Steppler, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Arnecke Siebold Rechtsanwaltes Frankfurt Off, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
AIR & SPACE LAW | 2011年 / 36卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
On 26 November 2010, Germany's Federal Council consented to the Parliament's plans to introduce an Air Travel Tax (Luftverkehrsteuer/LuftVSt - ATT) by way of the new Air Travel Tax Act - (Luftverkehrsteuergesetz/LuftVStG - ATTA). The new law entered into force beginning of this year - on 01 January 2011. Regardless of the new ATT only taking effect as of this year, flights booked on or after 01 September 2010 departing on or after 01 January 2011 were already subject to the new tax, provided the tangible flight actually starts from a domestic German airport. Therefore, ATT is only payable once the trip from a German airport has actually begun, irrespective when the aircraft ticket was purchased (provided this occurred after 31 August 2010). By means of the ATT, the German Government endeavours to bring forward the expected earnings from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) in the year 2012 and onwards. Similar to European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS), foreign carriers are subject to the new tax as well, which causes comparable concerns as regards customary international law and the Chicago Convention, for example. Actually the legal repercussions go beyond that since it can well be argued that the new tax is also a violation of the German Constitution and not in line with European State aid law, see Articles 107 and 108 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). During the political discussion prior to the cabinet's decision, it has been indicated that the tax will disappear as soon as aviation is included into the EU ETS. The tax bill now stipulates that the expected revenues are Euro (EUR) 1 billion and that the tax rates can only be reduced in relation to the earnings from EU ETS. Therefore, a good German tradition seems to be upheld: a tax once established is meant to stay - if not challenged in a court of law.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Dutch Ticket Tax and Article 15 of the Chicago Convention
    Havel, Brian F.
    van Antwerpen, Niels
    [J]. AIR & SPACE LAW, 2009, 34 (02): : 141 - 146
  • [2] Dutch Ticket Tax and Article 15 of the Chicago Convention (Continued)
    Havel, Brian F.
    van Antwerpen, Niels
    [J]. AIR & SPACE LAW, 2009, 34 (06): : 447 - 451
  • [3] Sugary Beverage Tax Policy: Lessons Learned From Tobacco
    Pomeranz, Jennifer L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (03) : E13 - E15
  • [4] Lessons learned from cigarette tax harmonisation in the European Union
    Blecher, Evan
    Ross, Hana
    Stoklosa, Michal
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2014, 23 (E1) : E12 - E14
  • [5] LESSONS IN TAX THEORY - DUTCH - HOFSTRA,HJ
    BRULL, D
    [J]. ECONOMIST, 1967, 115 (02): : 276 - 276
  • [6] Giving fruits and vegetables a tax break: lessons from a Dutch attempt
    Hagenaars, Luc L.
    Fazzino, Tera L.
    Mackenbach, Joreintje Dingena
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [8] Pneumothorax and Air Travel Lessons Learned From a Bag of Chips
    Baumann, Michael H.
    [J]. CHEST, 2009, 136 (03) : 655 - 656
  • [9] Local taxes: Lessons learned on the implementation of real property tax
    Piza, JR
    [J]. ANNUAL WORLD BANK CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENT IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN 1999, PROCEEDINGS: DECENTRALIZATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR, 2000, : 363 - 371
  • [10] Interstate tax coordination: Lessons from the international fuel tax agreement
    Denison, D
    Facer, RL
    [J]. NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2005, 58 (03) : 591 - 603