PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST LATE INFECTION FOLLOWING SPLENECTOMY AND BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT

被引:19
|
作者
FIELDING, AK
机构
[1] Dept. of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London WC1H, Gower St
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0268-960X(94)90079-W
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
There is a well. documented risk of late infection following both splenectomy and bone marrow transplantation. Tn asplenic patients, the phagocytic and antibody producing roles of the spleen are lost and there is a lifelong susceptibility to infection which may be overwhelming and fatal. Patients most at risk are children, those with underlying lymphoproliferative disorders and those receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Although it is hard to prove benefit from preventative strategies, patients are likely to benefit from prophylactic antibiotic therapy and from immunisation with pneumococcal, Haemophilus influenzae-B and meningococcal vaccine given prior to splenectomy. Following an allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT), recovery of immune function takes up to a year. During this time, patients are at high risk from cytomegalovirus (CMV) and varicella tester virus (VZV) infections and also from pneumocystis pneumonia. Prophylactic medications are used to good effect. The major threat of late infection occurs in patients with chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD)-there is increased susceptibility to bacterial, fungal and viral infections. Many patients without cGVHD recover immune function fully and many develop antibodies to specific recall antigens. This does not occur in all patients and although there is a low risk of infection with organisms against which vaccines are available. If it is not possible to measure specific antibody titres and consequently offer selective re-immunisation, then a universal vaccination strategy should be in force. Response to vaccines is likely to be poor before one year post BMT. For autologous transplant recipients, immune recovery is probably complete and routine re-immunisation is not likely to offer much benefit. For both asplenic and bone marrow transplant patients, education of patient and physician is important.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 191
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ANTIFUNGAL PROPHYLAXIS IN BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT
    LAM, HH
    ALTHAUS, BL
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1995, 29 (09) : 921 - 924
  • [2] ERYTHROPHAGOCYTOSIS IN RAT BONE-MARROW FOLLOWING SPLENECTOMY
    MARTON, F
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1973, 10 (02): : 81 - 87
  • [3] PROPHYLAXIS OF INFECTION IN BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTS
    WINSTON, DJ
    HO, WG
    GALE, RP
    CHAMPLIN, RE
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 24 : S15 - &
  • [4] ACYCLOVIR PROPHYLAXIS IN BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    LUNDGREN, G
    WILCZEK, H
    LONNQVIST, B
    LINDHOLM, A
    WAHREN, B
    RINGDEN, O
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1985, : 137 - 144
  • [5] PROPHYLAXIS OF EXPERIMENTAL BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT NEPHROPATHY
    COHEN, EP
    MOULDER, JE
    FISH, BL
    HILL, P
    JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1994, 124 (03): : 371 - 380
  • [6] INFECTION IN THE BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT
    WALTER, EA
    BOWDEN, RA
    INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1995, 9 (04) : 823 - +
  • [7] PROPHYLAXIS OF TOXOPLASMOSIS INFECTION WITH PYRIMETHAMINE/SULFADOXINE (FANSIDAR) IN BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    FOOT, ABM
    GARIN, YJF
    RIBAUD, P
    DEVERGIE, A
    DEROUIN, F
    GLUCKMAN, E
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1994, 14 (02) : 241 - 245
  • [8] INFECTION IN BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    MEYERS, JD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 81 (1A): : 27 - 38
  • [9] INFECTION PROPHYLAXIS IN THE PATIENT WITH BONE-MARROW FAILURE
    HANN, IM
    PRENTICE, HG
    CLINICS IN HAEMATOLOGY, 1984, 13 (03): : 523 - 547
  • [10] PNEUMOCOCCAL INFECTION IN BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    BOICE, JL
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 92 (04) : 571 - 571