Ten commandments of Lean Six Sigma: a practitioners' perspective

被引:68
|
作者
Antony, Jiju [1 ]
Gupta, Sandeep [1 ]
Sunder, Vijaya M. [2 ]
Gijo, E. V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Dept Business Management, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Management Studies, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Indian Stat Inst, SQC & OR Unit, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Six Sigma; Lean; Continuous improvement; Lean Six Sigma; Process excellence; Ten commandments;
D O I
10.1108/IJPPM-07-2017-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide lean and six sigma professionals and researchers of tomorrow with Ten Commandments of Lean Six Sigma (LSS). Design/methodology/approach The Ten Commandments of LSS are based on several years' experience of four authors who act as researchers, LSS Master Black Belts, consultants, practitioners and trainers on various topics of Lean, Six Sigma and general quality management and continuous improvement. Findings The Ten Commandments in our opinion include: alignment of LSS initiative with organisational strategy, LSS project selection and prioritisation, selection of top talent for the project execution, leadership for LSS, effective training and design of appropriate curriculum for different LSS roles, development of reward and recognition system, LSS sustainability, Linking LSS with Organisational Learning and Innovation, Linking LSS with Environmental Management System Standards and finally LSS and Big Data. Research limitations/implications The key features outlined in this paper are based on the practitioners of LSS. The authors of this article are planning to pursue a global study to critically evaluate these commandments by various practitioners of LSS. Originality/value The senior managers and executives of various businesses can use these commandments of LSS as a guide to achieve and sustain competitive advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1044
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ten commandments for successful implementation of Design for Six Sigma
    Gijo, E., V
    Bhat, Shreeranga
    Antony, Jiju
    Park, Sung H.
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2021, 33 (08): : 1666 - 1682
  • [2] Investigating the green impact of Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma
    Chugani, Nashmi
    Kumar, Vikas
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    Rocha-Lona, Luis
    Upadhyay, Arvind
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2017, 8 (01) : 7 - 32
  • [3] Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma: an analysis based on operations strategy
    Drohomeretski, Everton
    Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E.
    de Lima, Edson Pinheiro
    da Rosa Garbuio, Paula Andrea
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (03) : 804 - 824
  • [4] Lean six sigma project management - A stakeholder management perspective
    [J]. Sunder, Vijaya M. (mvijayasunder@gmail.com), 1600, Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. (28):
  • [5] Analysis of Lean Six Sigma tools from a multidimensional perspective
    Uluskan, Meryem
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2019, 30 (9-10) : 1167 - 1188
  • [6] Lean Six Sigma principles and practices under a management perspective
    Juliani, Fernando
    de Oliveira, Otavio Jose
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2020, 31 (15) : 1223 - 1244
  • [7] SIX SIGMA AND LEAN SIX SIGMA: A LITERATURE SURVEY
    Akkaya, Gokay
    Turanoglu, Betul
    Oztas, Sinan
    [J]. SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2014, 32 (04): : 503 - 523
  • [8] A critical perspective on the changing patterns of Lean Six Sigma research
    Rodgers, Bryan
    Antony, Jiju
    Gupta, Sandeep
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 68 (01) : 248 - 258
  • [9] Six Sigma vs Lean Some perspectives from leading academics and practitioners
    Antony, Jiju
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 60 (02) : 185 - +
  • [10] The ten commandments of quality: a performance perspective
    Antony, Jiju
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 64 (05) : 723 - 735