Misclassification of a binary exposure in case control studies is usually assessed by sensitivity and specificity of the measured exposure. Sensitivity and specificity do not adequately measure the degree of misclassification because they assess only the proportion of truly exposed (or unexposed) subjects who are misclassified by the defective measurement. They do not account for the proportion of subjects, categorized by the defective measurement as either exposed or unexposed, who are misclassified, in other words, the predictive value of misclassification is by ''quality indices'' that take both of these criteria into account and that are essentially rescaled sensitivity and specificity, or predictive value, measures. I present the relation between measured and actual odds ratios in terms of quality indices. If quality indices are nondifferential or proportional, there is no misclassification bias to the odds ratio. The relation offers a new approach to correcting measured odds ratios.
机构:
Univ Hong Kong, Ctr Genom Sci, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R ChinaUniv Hong Kong, Ctr Genom Sci, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
Mak, Timothy Shin Heng
Best, Nicky
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, EnglandUniv Hong Kong, Ctr Genom Sci, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
Best, Nicky
Rushton, Lesley
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, EnglandUniv Hong Kong, Ctr Genom Sci, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
Rushton, Lesley
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS,
2015,
11
(01):
: 135
-
149