COMPARISON OF STOCHASTIC AND DETERMINISTIC METHODS FOR MODELING SPUR KINETICS

被引:32
|
作者
PIMBLOTT, SM
LAVERNE, JA
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3577577
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Stochastic and deterministic kinetic methods have been used to model the temporal evolution of spatially nonhomogeneous clusters of reactants resulting from the dissociation of one to six water molecules into either H3O+, OH, and e-(aq), or H atoms and OH radicals. When the ionic fragmentation initially producing H3O+, OH, and e-(aq) is considered, the stochastic and deterministic methods predict similar time dependences for the decay of the reactive species; however, the two methods suggest very different product yields. For a two-dissociation spur, the deterministic treatment overstimates both the H2 and the H2O2 yields by about 70%. The error decreases to less than 15% for a spur with six water dissociations. For a distribution of spurs representing a high-energy electron track, the differences in the predicted yields of reactants are less than 6% at 0.1 μs, but the stochastic and deterministic predictions for the yields of H2 and H2O2 differ by about 50%. The kinetics of spurs produced by the fragmentation of water to H atom and OH radical shows discrepancies in both the reactant and the product yields. The size of the discrepancy decreases as the number of H/OH pairs increases, and the predictions of the two techniques are almost the same for clusters of six water dissociations.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 23
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STOCHASTIC AND DETERMINISTIC MODELS OF SPUR KINETICS - INITIAL DISTRIBUTIONS AND COMPARISONS
    GREEN, NJB
    PILLING, MJ
    CLIFFORD, P
    BURNS, WG
    JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY-FARADAY TRANSACTIONS I, 1984, 80 : 1313 - 1322
  • [2] COMPARISON OF DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC KINETICS FOR NONLINEAR-SYSTEMS
    ZHENG, Q
    ROSS, J
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 94 (05): : 3644 - 3648
  • [3] STOCHASTIC MODELING OF PARTIALLY DIFFUSION-CONTROLLED REACTIONS IN SPUR KINETICS
    PIMBLOTT, SM
    GREEN, NJB
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 96 (23): : 9338 - 9348
  • [4] Stochastic vs. deterministic modeling of intracellular viral kinetics
    Srivastava, R
    You, L
    Summers, J
    Yin, J
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 218 (03) : 309 - 321
  • [5] COMPARISON OF STOCHASTIC AND DETERMINISTIC EXPERIMENTAL FREQUENCY RESPONSE METHODS
    COULMAN, GA
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1966, 44 (03): : 176 - &
  • [6] A comparison of fuzzy, stochastic and deterministic methods in linear programming
    Lodwick, W
    Jamison, D
    Russell, S
    PEACHFUZZ 2000 : 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FUZZY INFORMATION PROCESSING SOCIETY - NAFIPS, 2000, : 321 - 325
  • [7] Comparison of fuzzy, stochastic and deterministic methods in linear programming
    Lodwick, Weldon
    Jamison, Dave
    Russell, Steve
    Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS, 2000, : 321 - 325
  • [8] Comparison Between Deterministic and Stochastic Methods for the Synthesis of Aperiodic Arrays
    Buttazzoni, G.
    Babich, F.
    Vatta, F.
    Comisso, M.
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION AND USNC-URSI RADIO SCIENCE MEETING, 2019, : 51 - 52
  • [9] PATIENT-SPECIFIC NEURAL MASS MODELING - STOCHASTIC AND DETERMINISTIC METHODS
    Freestone, D. R.
    Kuhlmann, L.
    Chong, M. S.
    Nesic, D.
    Grayden, D. B.
    Aram, P.
    Postoyan, R.
    CooK, M. J.
    RECENT ADVANCES IN PREDICTING AND PREVENTING EPILEPTIC SEIZURES, 2013, : 63 - 82
  • [10] DETERMINISTIC IN CONTRAST TO STOCHASTIC MODELING
    ROSLER, U
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 1991, 107 (02) : 155 - 160