Protein Degradation Pathways Regulate the Functions of Helicases in the DNA Damage Response and Maintenance of Genomic Stability

被引:17
|
作者
Sommers, Joshua A. [1 ]
Suhasini, Avvaru N. [2 ]
Brosh, Robert M., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIA, Lab Mol Gerontol, NIH, NIH Biomed Res Ctr, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Med Oncol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
来源
BIOMOLECULES | 2015年 / 5卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.3390/biom5020590
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Degradation of helicases or helicase-like proteins, often mediated by ubiquitin-proteasomal pathways, plays important regulatory roles in cellular mechanisms that respond to DNA damage or replication stress. The Bloom's syndrome helicase (BLM) provides an example of how helicase degradation pathways, regulated by post-translational modifications and protein interactions with components of the Fanconi Anemia (FA) interstrand cross-link (ICL) repair pathway, influence cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair, and replication restart. The FANCM DNA translocase can be targeted by checkpoint kinases that exert dramatic effects on FANCM stability and chromosomal integrity. Other work provides evidence that degradation of the F-box DNA helicase (FBH1) helps to balance translesion synthesis (TLS) and homologous recombination (HR) repair at blocked replication forks. Degradation of the helicase-like transcription factor (HLTF), a DNA translocase and ubiquitylating enzyme, influences the choice of post replication repair (PRR) pathway. Stability of the Werner syndrome helicase-nuclease (WRN) involved in the replication stress response is regulated by its acetylation. Turning to transcription, stability of the Cockayne Syndrome Group B DNA translocase (CSB) implicated in transcription-coupled repair (TCR) is regulated by a CSA ubiquitin ligase complex enabling recovery of RNA synthesis. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that helicases can be targeted for degradation to maintain genome homeostasis.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 616
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mechanisms of RecQ helicases in pathways of DNA metabolism and maintenance of genomic stability
    Sharma, Sudha
    Doherty, Kevin M.
    Brosh, Robert M., Jr.
    BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 398 : 319 - 337
  • [2] Protein degradation in DNA damage response
    Kouranti, Ilektra
    Peyroche, Anne
    SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (05) : 538 - 545
  • [3] Roles of Pif1-like helicases in the maintenance of genomic stability
    Boule, Jean-Baptiste
    Zakian, Virginia A.
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2006, 34 (15) : 4147 - 4153
  • [4] Mechanisms of maintenance of genomic stability by BLM and RECQL4 helicases
    Sengupta, Sagar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2015, 36 : S102 - S102
  • [5] The DNA damage response pathways: at the crossroad of protein modifications
    Michael SY Huen
    Junjie Chen
    Cell Research, 2008, 18 : 8 - 16
  • [6] The DNA damage response pathways: at the crossroad of protein modifications
    Huen, Michael Sy
    Chen, Junjie
    CELL RESEARCH, 2008, 18 (01) : 8 - 16
  • [7] The drosophila Nbs protein functions in multiple pathways for the maintenance of genome stability
    Ciapponi, Laura
    Cenci, Giovanni
    Gatti, Maurizio
    GENETICS, 2006, 173 (03) : 1447 - 1454
  • [8] Fbw7 and Usp28 regulate Myc protein stability in response to DNA damage
    Popov, Nikita
    Herold, Steffi
    Llamazares, Maria
    Schuelein, Christina
    Eilers, Martin
    CELL CYCLE, 2007, 6 (19) : 2327 - 2331
  • [9] The Therapeutic Potential of DNA Damage Repair Pathways and Genomic Stability in Lung Cancer
    Burgess, Joshua T.
    Rose, Maddison
    Boucher, Didier
    Plowman, Jennifer
    Molloy, Christopher
    Fisher, Mark
    O'Leary, Connor
    Richard, Derek J.
    O'Byrne, Kenneth J.
    Bolderson, Emma
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [10] Maintenance of genome stability: the unifying role of interconnections between the DNA damage response and RNA-processing pathways
    Mikolaskova, B.
    Jurcik, M.
    Cipakova, I.
    Kretova, M.
    Chovanec, M.
    Cipak, L.
    CURRENT GENETICS, 2018, 64 (05) : 971 - 983