ANALYSIS OF RISK-FACTORS FOR GASTRIC DILATATION AND DILATATION-VOLVULUS IN DOGS

被引:0
|
作者
GLICKMAN, LT
GLICKMAN, NW
PEREZ, CM
SCHELLENBERG, DB
LANTZ, GC
机构
[1] PURDUE UNIV,CTR APPL ETHOL & HUMAN ANIM INTERACT,W LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
[2] PURDUE UNIV,DEPT VET CLIN SCI,W LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
关键词
CANINE SPECIES; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GASTRIC DILATATION-VOLVULUS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The Veterinary Medical Data Base was wed to conduct an epidemiologic study of gastric dilatation and dilatation-volvulus (GDv) to describe changes over rime in frequency of canine hospital admissions, to identify risk factors, and to estimate their relative importance. Cases in this case-control study included 1,934 dogs with GDv that were admitted to 12 participating veterinary hospitals from 1980 to 1989. The controls were 3,868 dogs with other diagnoses that were randomly selected from the same hospitals. Frequency of GDv per 1,000 canine hospital admissions ranged from 2.9 to 6.8. The case fatality rate was 28.6 and 33.3% for gastric dilatation alone and for gastric dilatation with volvulus, respectively Using logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence limits (95% CL) for GDv associated with purebred vs mixed-breed dogs were 2.5 and 2.1, 3.0, respectively. The risk of GDV was associated with increasing age (X(2) = 305.6, P < 0.0001) and increasing weight (X(2) = 627.8, P < 0.0001). Significant association of GDV risk with sex or neuter status was not found. The 5 breeds having at least 10 cases and 8 controls and with the highest risk of GDv were Great Dane (OR, 10.0; 95% CL, 6.4, 15.6), Weimaraner (OR, 4.6; 95% CL, 2.3, 9.2), Saint Bernard (OR, 4.2; 95% CL, 2.3, 7.4), Gordon Setter (OR, 4.1; 95% CL, 1.8, 9.3), and Irish Setter (OR, 3.5; 95% CL, 2.4, 5.0). The effect of increasing body weight on GDv risk was less than that of increasing ideal adult breed weight, determined by published breed standards. There was considerable heterogeneity of GDv risk for individual breeds within ideal adult breed-weight groups. The overall pattern of risk was suggestive that, in addition to age, body weight, and neuter status, a dog's body (thoracic) conformation also was an important determinant of susceptibility to GDv.
引用
收藏
页码:1465 / 1471
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gastric dilatation-volvulus in dogs
    Broome, CJ
    Walsh, VP
    NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2003, 51 (06) : 275 - 283
  • [2] GASTRIC DILATATION-VOLVULUS IN DOGS
    HOSGOOD, G
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 204 (11) : 1742 - 1747
  • [3] Risk factors associated with gastric dilatation-volvulus
    Hellweg, P
    Zentek, J
    KLEINTIERPRAXIS, 2005, 50 (10): : 611 - +
  • [4] THERAPY OF GASTRIC DILATATION-VOLVULUS IN DOGS
    LEIB, MS
    MARTIN, RA
    COMPENDIUM ON CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR THE PRACTICING VETERINARIAN, 1987, 9 (12): : 1155 - 1165
  • [5] Gastric dilatation-volvulus syndrome in dogs
    Monnet, E
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2003, 33 (05) : 987 - +
  • [6] GASTRIC DILATATION-VOLVULUS IN DOGS - AN UPDATE
    LEIB, MS
    BLASS, CE
    COMPENDIUM ON CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR THE PRACTICING VETERINARIAN, 1984, 6 (11): : 961 - &
  • [7] Benefits of prophylactic gastropexy for dogs at risk of gastric dilatation-volvulus
    Ward, MP
    Patronek, GJ
    Glickman, LT
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2003, 60 (04) : 319 - 329
  • [8] Incidence of and breed-related risk factors for gastric dilatation-volvulus in dogs
    Glickman, LT
    Glickman, NW
    Schellenberg, DB
    Raghavan, M
    Lee, TL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 216 (01): : 40 - 45
  • [9] MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA IN DOGS WITH GASTRIC DILATATION-VOLVULUS
    MUIR, WW
    WEISBRODE, SE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 181 (04) : 363 - 366
  • [10] An Internet-based survey of risk factors for surgical gastric dilatation-volvulus in dogs
    Pipan, Marko
    Brown, Dorothy Cimino
    Battaglia, Carmelo L.
    Otto, Cynthia M.
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 240 (12): : 1456 - 1462