Interventions to improve care coordination between primary healthcare and oncology care providers: a systematic review

被引:38
|
作者
Tomasone, Jennifer R. [1 ]
Brouwers, Melissa C. [2 ,3 ]
Vukmirovic, Marija [2 ,3 ]
Grunfeld, Eva [4 ]
O'Brien, Mary Ann [4 ]
Urquhart, Robin [5 ]
Walker, Melanie [6 ]
Webster, Fiona [4 ]
Fitch, Margaret [7 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Studies, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Oncol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Escarpment Canc Res Inst, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Family & Community Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Surg, Halifax, NS, Canada
[6] Queens Univ, Canc Res Inst, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Bloomberg Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000077
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Coordination of patient care between primary care and oncology care providers is vital to care quality and outcomes across the cancer continuum, yet it is known to be challenging. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate current or new models of care and/or interventions aimed at improving coordination between primary care and oncology care providers for patients with adult breast and/or colorectal cancer. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination were searched for existing English language studies published between January 2000 and 15 May 2015. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomised studies were included if they evaluated a specific model/intervention that was designed to improve care coordination between primary care and oncology care providers, for any stage of the cancer continuum, for patients with adult breast and/or colorectal cancer. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Twenty-two studies (5 systematic reviews, 6 RCTs and 11 non-randomised studies) were included and varied with respect to the targeted phase of the cancer continuum, type of model or intervention tested, and outcome measures. The majority of studies showed no statistically significant changes in any patient, provider or system outcomes. Owing to conceptual and methodological limitations in this field, the review is unable to provide specific conclusions about the most effective or preferred model/ intervention to improve care coordination. Imprecise results that lack generalisability and definitiveness provide limited evidence to base the development of future interventions and policies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Documenting coordination of cancer care between primary care providers and oncology specialists in Canada
    Brouwers, Melissa C.
    Vukmirovic, Marija
    Tomasone, Jennifer R.
    Grunfeld, Eva
    Urquhart, Robin
    O'Brien, Mary Ann
    Walker, Melanie
    Webster, Fiona
    Fitch, Margaret
    [J]. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2016, 62 (10) : E616 - E625
  • [2] Provider Communication: The Key to Care Coordination Between Tribal Primary Care and Community Oncology Providers
    Dwyer, Kathleen
    Anderson, Amber
    Doescher, Mark
    Campbell, Janis
    Wharton, Betty
    Nagykaldi, Zsolt
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2022, 49 (01) : 21 - 36
  • [3] Financial Interventions to Improve Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review
    Matthews, Samantha
    Qureshi, Nabeel
    Levin, Jonathan S.
    Eberhart, Nicole K.
    Breslau, Joshua
    McBain, Ryan K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 67 (01) : 134 - 146
  • [4] Systematic Review of Interventions to Improve Health Providers Smoking Cessation Care in Pregnancy
    Bar-Zeev, Yael
    Bonevski, Billie
    Skelton, Eliza
    Gruppetta, Maree
    Palazzi, Kerrin
    Oldmeadow, Chris
    Gould, Gillian
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 : 30 - 30
  • [5] Preventive healthcare for young children: A systematic review of interventions in primary care
    Alexander, Karyn E.
    Brijnath, Bianca
    Biezen, Ruby
    Hampton, Kerry
    Mazza, Danielle
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 99 : 236 - 250
  • [6] The effects of the primary health care providers' prescription behavior interventions to improve the rational use of antibiotics: a systematic review
    Yao, Lu
    Yin, Jia
    Huo, Ruiting
    Yang, Ding
    Shen, Liyan
    Wen, Shuqin
    Sun, Qiang
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND POLICY, 2020, 5 (01)
  • [7] The effects of the primary health care providers’ prescription behavior interventions to improve the rational use of antibiotics: a systematic review
    Lu Yao
    Jia Yin
    Ruiting Huo
    Ding Yang
    Liyan Shen
    Shuqin Wen
    Qiang Sun
    [J]. Global Health Research and Policy, 5
  • [8] A systematic review of therapy coordination between primary and specialist care
    Liz, Eladio Fernandez
    Luque Mellado, Francisco Jose
    [J]. ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2007, 39 (01): : 15 - 21
  • [9] COORDINATION OF PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS
    HETTLER, DL
    MCALISTER, WH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1988, 65 (02): : 135 - 139
  • [10] Electronic Consultation in Primary Care Between Providers and Patients: Systematic Review
    Mold, Freda
    Hendy, Jane
    Lai, Yi-Ling
    de Lusignan, Simon
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 7 (04) : 4 - 17