ANTITRUST-LAW SHERMAN ACT, SECTION 2 - A MONOPOLIST HAS NO DUTY TO PREDISCLOSE INFORMATION ON INNOVATIONS

被引：0

|

作者：

ANTHONY, ME

机构：

来源：

NOTRE DAME LAWYER | 1980年 / 55卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：554 / 573

页数：20

相关论文

共 10 条

[1] ANTITRUST-LAW AND MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS - ARE MUNICIPALITIES EXEMPT FROM SHERMAN ACT COVERAGE UNDER PARKER DOCTRINE
TCHORNI, EJ
GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL, 1977, 65 (06) : 547 - 592
[2] ANTITRUST-LAW - SUPREME-COURT HOLDS UNREASONABLE SECURITIES-EXCHANGE REGULATION OF NONMEMBER TO BE VIOLATION OF SHERMAN ACT
不详
DUKE LAW JOURNAL, 1964, (01) : 148 - 154
[3] HOW ANTITRUST LAW COULD REFORM COLLEGE FOOTBALL: SECTION 1 OF THE SHERMAN ACT AND THE HOPE FOR TANGIBLE CHANGE
Edelman, Marc
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2016, 68 (02): : 809 - 826
[4] ANTITRUST-LAW - SUPREME-COURT DEVELOPS PRESUMPTION OF ILLEGALITY IN APPLYING SECTION 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT TO BANK MERGER
不详
DUKE LAW JOURNAL, 1964, (01) : 139 - 147
[5] DUTY TO COOPERATE UNDER SECTION-2 OF THE SHERMAN ACT - ASPEN SKIINGS SLIPPERY SLOPE
KAPEN, AY
CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 1987, 72 (05) : 1047 - 1074
[6] ANTITRUST - SHERMAN ACT , S ECTION 2-US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IMPOSES LIABILITY ON GOOGLE FOR ENGAGING IN ANTICOMPETITIVE CONDUCT AS A MONOPOLIST
不详
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2025, 138 (2025) : 891 - 898
[7] ANTITRUST CONSEQUENCES OF UNITED-STATES CORPORATE PAYMENTS TO FOREIGN OFFICIALS - APPLICABILITY OF SECTION 2(C) OF ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT AND SECTION-1 AND SECTION-2 OF SHERMAN-ACT
RILL, JF
FRANK, RL
VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 1977, 30 (02) : 131 - 165
[8] ANTITRUST LAW - SCHWINN RE-CYCLED - ENFORCED RESTRICTIONS ON LOCATION OF FRANCHISED RETAIL OUTLETS HELD A PER SE VIOLATION OF SECTION 1 OF SHERMAN-ACT - GTE SYLVANIA, INC V CONTINENTAL TV, INC
不详
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 1974, 49 (05) : 957 - 970
[9] ADMINISTRATIVE LAW-FOIA-SECTION 552 (B) (7) OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT OF 1970 PRECLUDES DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS COMPILED AS INVESTIGATORY FILES AND USED FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES BY A FEDERAL AGENCY EVEN WHEN ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN TERMINATED-FRANKEL V SEC, 460 F2D 813 (2D CIR), CERT DENIED, 41 USLW 3179 (US OCT 10, 19
WOLFE, RH
GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 1972, 41 (01) : 93 - 106
[10] ENVIRONMENTAL LAW-NEPA-SECTION 102 OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1969 IMPOSES ON FEDERAL AGENCIES A JUDICIALLY ENFORCEABLE DUTY TO CONSIDER AT EVERY DISTINCTIVE AND COMPREHENSIVE STAGE OF AN AGENCY REVIEW PROCESS ALL ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES EXCEPT THOSE EXPRESSLY WITHIN EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF ANOTHER AGENCY-CLIFFS,C COORDINATING COMMITTEE, INC V AEC, 449 F2D 1109 (DC CIR 1971)
KESSLER, NS
PORTER, PA
GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 1972, 40 (03) : 558 - 571