Validity and Reliability of Breastfeeding Advice and Coping with Breastfeeding Instruments

被引:1
|
作者
Ikonen, Riikka [1 ]
Aho, Anna Liisa [2 ]
Kaunonen, Marja [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Level II NICU, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Univ Tampere, Sch Hlth Sci, Tampere, Finland
[3] Pirkanmaa Hosp Dist, Gen Adm, Tampere, Finland
来源
NEONATAL NETWORK | 2014年 / 33卷 / 06期
关键词
breastfeeding; infant; premature; counseling; pilot projects;
D O I
10.1891/0730-0832.33.6.322
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose: To pilot two instruments: Breastfeeding Advice and Coping with Breastfeeding in NICU settings. Design: Psychometric testing of the Breastfeeding Advice and Coping with Breastfeeding instruments. Sample: Mothers (N = 47) with singleton or twin preterm (<= 36 + 6 gestation weeks) infant(s) N = 55) at discharge collected from seven NICUs in Finland. Main outcome variables: The validity and reliability of two instruments: Breastfeeding Advice measuring the quality of breastfeeding counseling and Coping with Breastfeeding measuring the mothers' experienced ability to cope with breastfeeding issues. Results: Infants' mean gestation age was 32.5 weeks at birth. The items of the instruments were supported by previous studies, demonstrating content validity. There was a significant correlation ( r = .72, p< .001) between Breastfeeding Advice and Coping with Breastfeeding, indicating constructor validity. Evidence for predictive validity was not found. Good reliability for internal consistency of the Breastfeeding Advice (Cronbach's alpha = .86) and Coping with Breastfeeding (Cronbach's alpha = .85) was found.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 328
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advice on breastfeeding:: Full breastfeeding, part-breastfeeding, ablactation
    Abou-Dakn, M
    Wöckel, A
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2005, 65 (12) : 1194 - 1197
  • [2] The validity and reliability of maternal recall of breastfeeding practice
    Li, RW
    Scanlon, KS
    Serdula, MK
    [J]. NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2005, 63 (04) : 103 - 110
  • [3] Breastfeeding Telephone Triage and Advice
    Marinelli, Kathleen A.
    [J]. CLINICAL LACTATION, 2013, 4 (04) : 169 - 170
  • [4] Reliability and validity of the Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool in the Turkish population
    Dolgun, Gulumser
    Inal, Sevil
    Erdim, Leyla
    Korkut, Sevda
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2018, 57 : 47 - 53
  • [5] Prenatal breastfeeding self efficacy scale: validity and reliability study
    Hazar, Hale Uyar
    Akca, Esin Uzar
    [J]. TURK PEDIATRI ARSIVI-TURKISH ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS, 2018, 53 (04): : 222 - +
  • [6] Breastfeeding: Telephone Triage and Advice
    Lee, Nikki
    [J]. CLINICAL LACTATION, 2016, 7 (04) : 163 - 163
  • [7] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool
    Tomita, Aya
    Tahara-Sasagawa, Emi
    Yonezawa, Kaori
    Usui, Yuriko
    Haruna, Megumi
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2023, 121
  • [8] Reliability and validity of a Malay-version questionnaire assessing knowledge of breastfeeding
    Ismail, Tengku Alina Tengku
    Sulaiman, Zaharah
    [J]. MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 17 (03): : 32 - 39
  • [9] A questionnaire for assessing breastfeeding intentions and practices in Nigeria: validity, reliability and translation
    Andy Emmanuel
    Sheila E. Clow
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [10] What can be learned from the validity and reliability testing of a breastfeeding questionnaire?
    VanVleet, MW
    Clark, M
    Alario, AJ
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 268A - 268A