Does commercialisation drive technical efficiency improvements in Ethiopian subsistence agriculture?

被引:0
|
作者
Tirkaso, Wondmagegn [1 ]
Hess, Sebastian [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Econ, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Kiel, Dept Agr Econ, Dairy & Food Ind Econ, Kiel, Germany
关键词
technical efficiency; commercialisation; smallholders; stochastic frontier; Ethiopia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The conditions in which increased market participation leads to improved technical efficiency are still not adequately understood. This study therefore investigated farmers' market participation rates and their predicted technical efficiency scores by performing a two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression analysis using household-level data obtained from the 2009 Ethiopian rural household survey. The predicted efficiency score from the stochastic frontier production function showed that the farmers had a mean technical efficiency score of 40.2%, implying that their output could be increased substantially if improvements were made to existing input mixes. The variables related to educational level and radio and mobile telephone access were positively linked to a farmer's technical efficiency. The estimated results also indicated that farmers with a higher degree of commercialisation were technically more efficient compared to those with lower market participation. The overall results suggest the importance of increasing the market participation rate of smallholders in order to improve agricultural productivity in rural Ethiopia.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 57
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE ROMANIAN AGRICULTURE FROM SUBSISTENCE TO EFFICIENCY
    Gavrilescu, Dinu
    Gavrilescu, Camelia
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2006, 53 : 637 - 646
  • [2] The economic cost of upland and gully erosion on subsistence agriculture for a watershed in the Ethiopian highlands
    Ayele, Getaneh K.
    Gessess, Azalu A.
    Addisie, Meseret B.
    Tilahun, Seifu A.
    Tenessa, Daregot B.
    Langendoen, Eddy J.
    Steenhuis, Tammo S.
    Nicholson, Charles F.
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS-AFJARE, 2015, 10 (04): : 265 - 278
  • [3] TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURE
    FARE, R
    GRABOWSKI, R
    GROSSKOPF, S
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1985, 17 (02) : 205 - 214
  • [4] Technical efficiency of the Russian agriculture
    Korotchenya, Valery
    [J]. VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, 2016, (04): : 144 - 155
  • [5] TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY IN NEPALESE AGRICULTURE
    BELBASE, K
    GRABOWSKI, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPING AREAS, 1985, 19 (04): : 515 - 525
  • [6] DOES URBAN PROXIMITY ENHANCE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY? EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE AGRICULTURE
    Duvivier, Chloe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2013, 53 (05) : 923 - 943
  • [7] Does ecologization matter for technical efficiency in crop production? A case of Swedish agriculture
    Huang, Wei
    Manevska-Tasevska, Gordana
    Hansson, Helena
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2024, 138
  • [8] Process engineering tools drive efficiency improvements
    Fiske, Tom
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2009, 88 (06): : 15 - 15
  • [9] TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF AGRICULTURE IN EU COUNTRIES
    Rusielik, Robert
    Szczecinska, Beata
    [J]. ZBORNIK VELEUCILISTA U RIJECI-JOURNAL OF THE POLYTECHNICS OF RIJEKA, 2020, 8 (01): : 151 - 168
  • [10] Technical efficiency estimates of Scottish agriculture: A note
    Barnes, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 59 (02) : 370 - 376