AIRBORNE MICROORGANISMS AND ENDOTOXIN IN ANIMAL HOUSES

被引:86
|
作者
DUTKIEWICZ, J
POMORSKI, ZJH
SITKOWSKA, J
KRYSINSKATRACZYK, E
SKORSKA, C
PRAZMO, Z
CHOLEWA, G
WOJTOWICZ, H
机构
[1] Institute of Agricultural Medicine, Lublin, 20-950, P.O. Box 185
[2] Department of Veterinary Medicine, Agricultural University School, Lublin, 20-934
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00173139409427837
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Concentrations of microorganisms, dust and bacterial endotoxin were determined in the air of 18 animal houses (four cowsheds, nine horse stables and five piggeries) in eastern Poland. Total mesophilic bacteria numbered 568.7-1480.7 colony forming units (CFU) x 10(3) m-3 in piggeries. 43.9-280.5 CFU X 10(3) m-3 in cowsheds, and 26.2-150.1 CFU x 10(3) m-3 in horse stables. Corynebacteria (Corynebacterium spp., Arthrobacter spp.) predominated. Concentrations of Gram-negative bacteria, thermophilic actinomycetes and fungi were smaller (mostly in the range of 10(2)-10(4) CFU m-3) except for one cowshed and two stables where concentrations of thermophilic actinomycetes exceeded 100 CFU x 10(3) m-3. Thermoactinomyces vulgaris and Saccharopolyspora rectivirgula, both known to be strongly allergenic, were the predominant actinomycetes. Concentrations of airborne dust were 0.15-14.05 mg m-3. There were large concentrations of bacterial endotoxin in the air of piggeries, in the range 1.88-75.0 mug m-3, but concentrations were much smaller in other houses and mostly did not exceed a safe level of 0.1 mug m-3. The results show that the farm workers and housed animals can be exposed to large quantities of airborne microbes and their products that pose a potential risk of respiratory disease resulting from the immunomodulatory action of these organisms.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 90
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigations on airborne microorganisms in animal stables -: 4.: Report:: Airborne gram-negative bacteria and airborne endotoxin in pig houses
    Zucker, BA
    Müller, W
    [J]. BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2002, 115 (1-2): : 30 - 36
  • [2] Reducing airborne dust and microorganisms in poultry houses
    不详
    [J]. BIOCYCLE, 2002, 43 (05) : 12 - 12
  • [3] SCRUBBER CAPABILITIES TO REMOVE AIRBORNE MICROORGANISMS AND OTHER AERIAL POLLUTANTS FROM THE EXHAUST AIR OF ANIMAL HOUSES
    Aarnink, A. J. A.
    Landman, W. J. M.
    Melse, R. W.
    Zhao, Y.
    Ploegaert, J. P. M.
    Huynh, T. T. T.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2011, 54 (05) : 1921 - 1930
  • [4] EMISSIONS OF DUST AND MICROORGANISMS FROM ANIMAL HOUSES
    HILLIGER, HG
    [J]. DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1991, 98 (07): : 257 - 261
  • [5] Exposure to airborne microorganisms and endotoxin in herb processing plants
    Dutkiewicz, J
    Krysinska-Traczyk, E
    Skórska, C
    Sitkowska, J
    Prazmo, Z
    Golec, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (02) : 201 - 211
  • [6] Exposure to airborne microorganisms and endotoxin in a potato processing plant
    Dutkiewicz, J
    Krysinska-Traczyk, E
    Skórska, C
    Cholewa, G
    Sitkowska, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2002, 9 (02) : 225 - 235
  • [7] Endotoxin concentration in modern animal houses in southern Bavaria
    Schierl, Rudolf
    Heise, Antje
    Egger, Ulrich
    Schneider, Friedheim
    Eichelser, Robert
    Neser, Stefan
    Nowak, Dennis
    [J]. ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2007, 14 (01) : 129 - 136
  • [8] Airborne Microorganisms, Endotoxin, and Dust Concentration in Wood Factories in Italy
    Gioffre, Angela
    Marramao, Antronella
    Ianno, Antonino
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2012, 56 (02): : 161 - 169
  • [9] Exposure of workers to airborne microorganisms in open-air swine houses
    Chang, CW
    Chung, H
    Huang, CF
    Su, HJJ
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 67 (01) : 155 - 161
  • [10] Airborne gram-negative bacterial flora in animal houses
    Zucker, BA
    Trojan, S
    Müller, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES B-INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 47 (01): : 37 - 46