Enhancing translational researchers' ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio

被引:32
|
作者
Joosten, Yvonne A. [1 ,2 ]
Israel, Tiffany L. [2 ]
Head, Amy [3 ]
Vaughn, Yolanda [4 ]
Gil, Victoria Villalta [5 ]
Mouton, Charles [6 ]
Wilkins, Consuelo H. [1 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Med Educ & Adm, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Inst Med & Publ Hlth, 2525 West End Ave 6th Floor, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Sch Social Work, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Neighborhoods Resource Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Meharry Vanderbilt Alliance, Nashville, TN USA
[6] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Family Med, Galveston, TX USA
[7] Meharry Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Nashville, TN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Community stakeholders; community engagement; patient engagement; community engagement studio; translational researchers;
D O I
10.1017/cts.2018.323
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Community engagement is considered essential to effectively translate research into practice and is increasingly recognized as a key to successful clinical trial recruitment. Challenges to engaging community stakeholders in research persist and new methods are needed to facilitate meaningful stakeholder involvement. The Community Engagement Studio (CE Studio), a consultative model, has been used at every stage of the research process. Best practices drawn from the model could inform other methods of engagement. Using a mixed-methods approach that included evaluation surveys, impact surveys and interviews, we assessed the CE Studio program. We analyzed data from 75 CE Studios; 65 researchers and 591 community members completed surveys and 10 researchers completed interviews. Surveys indicate that 100% of researchers would request a CE Studio in the future, and 99.3% of community members would participate in a CE Studio again. We identified 6 practices to enhance community engagement in clinical and translational research: early input, researcher coaching, researcher humility, balancing power, neutral facilitator, and preparation of community stakeholders. These best practices may enhance the quality of existing community engagement approaches and improve the effectiveness of translational researchers' efforts to engage community stakeholders in their work.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 207
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A community engagement training program for basic and translational cancer researchers
    Ronald C. Chen
    Hope Krebill
    Teri Kennedy
    Sara Douglas
    Kristi L. Neufeld
    Danny R. Welch
    Cheryl Jernigan
    Kim S. Kimminau
    Kristy Johnston
    Jane Hughes
    Roy A. Jensen
    [J]. Cancer Causes & Control, 2023, 34 : 1123 - 1132
  • [2] A community engagement training program for basic and translational cancer researchers
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Krebill, Hope
    Kennedy, Teri
    Douglas, Sara
    Neufeld, Kristi L.
    Welch, Danny R.
    Jernigan, Cheryl
    Kimminau, Kim S.
    Johnston, Kristy
    Hughes, Jane
    Jensen, Roy A.
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2023, 34 (12) : 1123 - 1132
  • [3] Enhancing Performance and Sustainability of Community Health Worker Programs in Uganda: Lessons and Experiences From Stakeholders
    Musoke, David
    Atusingwize, Edwinah
    Ndejjo, Rawlance
    Ssemugabo, Charles
    Siebert, Penelope
    Gibson, Linda
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 9 (04): : 855 - 868
  • [4] Sustainability of community engagement - in the hands of stakeholders?
    Ramachandra, Anubama
    Abu Mansor, Nur Naha
    [J]. EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2014, 56 (07): : 588 - 598
  • [5] 2021 Community Engagement Studio Virtual Training Summit: Increasing the Diversity of Stakeholders Engaged in Research
    Fair, Alecia
    Dunkel, Leah
    Frost, Marquetta
    Israel, Tiffany
    Lane-MuMin, Felicia
    Lipham, Lexie
    Ray, Devan
    Spiroff, Meghan
    Witte, Brieanne
    Wolfsfeld, Cathy
    Vaughn, Yolanda
    Miller, Stephania T.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS-RESEARCH EDUCATION AND ACTION, 2024, 18 (02)
  • [6] Lessons from the field for community engagement and accountability
    Berland, Alex
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GOVERNANCE, 2019, 24 (04) : 261 - 266
  • [7] COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INDIGENOUS AND NONINDIGENOUS RESEARCHERS
    Lewis, Jordan
    Kim, Steffi
    [J]. INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 383 - 384
  • [8] Building a pipeline of community-engaged researchers: How interdisciplinary translational research training programs can collaborate with their Community Research Advisory Councils
    LaFave, Sarah E.
    Wallace, Duane J.
    Grover, Raneitra
    Clark, Roger
    Marks, Stacey
    Lacanienta, Cyd
    Evans, Crystal
    Kalil, Graziela Z.
    Ouyang, Pamela
    Himmelfarb, Cheryl R.
    Abshire, Martha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [9] Community Engagement: Lessons Learned From the AAASPS and SDBA
    Gorelick, Philip B.
    [J]. STROKE, 2022, 53 (03) : 654 - 662
  • [10] Community engagement for counterterrorism: lessons from the United Kingdom
    Briggs, Rachel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2010, 86 (04) : 971 - +