The Court enters a controversial doctrinal debate about the term "a close connection with the territory of Member States" that has come to occupy the doctrine, and to head the German doctrine. A debate is not over, in which the concept of "close connection" has had, in our interpretation, different meanings for Private International Law and European Law. However, a congruent result is possible if we consider that the directive only limit the "choice of law" in consumer contracts between member States. If the supplier and the consumer reside in a territory of the Member States, the law applicable to the contract will guarantee the consumer the minimum protection predicted in the directive. The Court only reinforces a strict transposition of art. 6 (2) of the directive, that leaves no margin for interpretation by the national legislator. In this case, this interpretation seems accurate to us.