The use of fibrolaryngoscopy in muscle tension dysphonia in telemarketers

被引:8
|
作者
Paoletti, Oscar A. [1 ]
Fraire, Maria E. [1 ]
Sanchez-Vallecillo, Maria V. [1 ]
Zernotti, Mauro [1 ]
Olmos, Manuel E. [1 ]
Zernotti, Mario E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sanatorio Allende, Serv Otorrinolaringol, Cordoba, Argentina
来源
ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA | 2012年 / 63卷 / 03期
关键词
Dysphonia; Tension; Muscle; Telemarketers; Fibrolaryngoscopy;
D O I
10.1016/j.otorri.2011.12.003
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: Muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is a voice disorder in the absence of current organic laryngeal pathology, without obvious psychogenic or neurological aetiology. The laryngeal features of MTD include a posterior glottal gap and supraglottic hyperfunctional activities; however, it remains unclear if these features are specific to MTD. This report aims to compare the laryngeal features in telemarketer patients with MTD versus non-dysphonic control subjects. Methods: We reported on an observational, analytic and transversal study. Fiberoptic nasal endoscopy was performed on 57 patients (28 telemarketers with MTD and 29 control subjects). These random-sequence videotapes were independently rated by an expert laryngologist according to the modified Morrison and Rammage classification. In addition, a questionnaire about vocal symptoms and other details was completed. Results: The posterior glottal gap was the most common feature in telemarketers with MTD, while incomplete glottal gap was observed more frequently in non-dysphonic patients. More than 70% of the videotapes were rated as pathologic. There was no statistical difference in the prevalence of normal features or bowing glottal gap between patients and control subjects. Anterior-posterior supraglottic contraction was more frequent in the control group. The major symptoms found were: voice gets tired quickly, increased vocal effort and neck tension. Conclusions: The heterogeneity in the laryngeal features in telemarketers with MTD seen under fibroscopy and their presence among the non-dysphonic population suggest that they cannot determine by themselves the diagnosis of MTD. (C) 2011 Elsevier Espana, S. L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 205
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Muscle Tension Dysphonia
    Plocienniczak, Michal
    Tracy, Lauren F.
    [J]. JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2022, 148 (09) : 895 - 895
  • [2] Use of topical lidocaine in the treatment of muscle tension dysphonia
    Dworkin, JP
    Meleca, RJ
    Simpson, ML
    Garfield, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2000, 14 (04) : 567 - 574
  • [3] Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia
    Kunduk M.
    Fink D.S.
    McWhorter A.J.
    [J]. Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports, 2016, 4 (3) : 175 - 182
  • [4] Evaluating the use of baclofen as adjunct treatment for muscle tension dysphonia
    Sambhu, Madhav
    Goh, Ted
    Golan, Hadas
    Pisegna, Jessica
    Noordzij, Jacob Pieter
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 43 (02)
  • [5] Differential diagnosis of muscle tension dysphonia and spasmodic dysphonia
    Roy, Nelson
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2010, 18 (03): : 165 - 170
  • [6] MUSCLE TENSION DYSPHONIA MASQUERADING AS ASTHMA
    Imam, K.
    Patel, S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 129 : S118 - S119
  • [7] Aerodynamic Measures in Muscle Tension Dysphonia
    Garaycochea, Octavio
    Alcalde, Juan
    Fernandez, Secundino
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2021, 35 (06) : 930 - 930
  • [8] ANATOMIC CORRELATION FOR MUSCLE TENSION DYSPHONIA
    BELISLE, GM
    MORRISON, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1983, 12 (05): : 319 - 321
  • [9] Task specificity in adductor spasmodic dysphonia versus muscle tension dysphonia
    Roy, N
    Gouse, M
    Mauszycki, SC
    Merrill, RM
    Smith, ME
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (02): : 311 - 316
  • [10] Muscle tension dysphonia and spasmodic dysphonia: The role of manual laryngeal tension reduction in diagnosis and management
    Roy, N
    Ford, CN
    Bless, DM
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1996, 105 (11): : 851 - 856