A COMPARISON OF THE FRISBY, RANDOM-DOT-E, TNO, AND RANDOT CIRCLES STEREOTESTS IN SCREENING AND OFFICE USE

被引：0

|

作者：

SIMONS, K ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNION UNIV ALBANY MED COLL,DEPT OPHTHALMOL,ALBANY,NY 12208

来源：

ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY | 1981年 / 99卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R77 [眼科学];

学科分类号：

100212 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：446 / 452

页数：7

相关论文

共 4 条

[1] Screening merit of the Lang II, Frisby, Randot, Titmus and TNO stereotests.
Ohlsson, JL
Villarreal, G
Cavazos, H
Abrahamsson, M
Treviño, E
Sjöström, A
Sjöstrand, J
[J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S705 - S705
[2] COMPARISON OF A MODIFIED (2-ITEM) FRISBY WITH THE STANDARD FRISBY AND RANDOM-DOT E STEREOTESTS WHEN USED WITH PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN
GRUBER, J
DICKEY, P
ROSNER, J
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1985, 62 (05): : 349 - 351
[3] The testability of young preschool children on the Random Dot E, Stereo Smile, and Preschool Randot Stereotests.
Schmidt, PP
[J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S728 - S728
[4] The Moving Dynamic Random Dot Stereosize test: Development, age norms, and comparison with the Frisby, Randot, and Stereo Smile tests
Leat, SJ
St Pierre, J
Hassan-Abadi, S
Faubert, J
[J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY & STRABISMUS, 2001, 38 (05) : 284 - 294