Normative Values for Near and Distance Clinical Tests of Stereoacuity

被引:22
|
作者
Piano, Marianne E. F. [1 ]
Tidbury, Laurence P. [2 ,3 ]
O'Connor, Anna R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Expt Psychol, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Directorate Orthopt & Vis Sci, Thompson Yates Bldg,Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB, Merseyside, England
关键词
Normative; stereopsis; stereotest;
D O I
10.1080/09273972.2016.1242636
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Extensive literature exists on normative stereoacuity values for younger children, but there is less information about normative stereoacuity in older children/adults. Individual stereotests cannot be used interchangeably-knowing the upper limit of normality for each test is important. This report details normative stereoacuity values for 5 near/distance stereotests drawn from a large sample of participants aged 16-40 years, across 3 studies. Methods: Participants (n=206, mean age 22.18 +/- 5.31 years) were administered the following stereotests: TNO, Preschool Randot, Frisby, Distance Randot, and Frisby-Davis 2. Medians and upper limits were calculated for each test. Results: Upper limits for each stereotest were as follows: TNO (n=127, upper limit=120 '' arc), Preschool Randot (PSR, n=206, upper limit=70 '' arc), Frisby (n=206, upper limit=40 '' arc), Distance Randot (n=127, upper limit=160 '' arc), and Frisby-Davis 2 (n=109, upper limit=25 '' arc). Conclusions: Normative values for each stereotest are identified and discussed with respect to other studies. Potential sources of variation between tests, within testing distances, are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 172
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic reliability and normative values of stereoacuity tests in preschool-aged children
    Afsari, Sonia
    Rose, Kathryn A.
    Pai, Amy Shih-I
    Gole, Glen A.
    Leone, Jody Fay
    Burlutsky, George
    Mitchell, Paul
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 97 (03) : 308 - 313
  • [2] Stereoacuity at distance and near
    Wong, BPH
    Woods, RL
    Peli, E
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2002, 79 (12) : 771 - 778
  • [3] EVALUATION OF CLINICAL STEREOACUITY TESTS
    MARSH, WR
    RAWLINGS, SC
    MUMMA, JV
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1980, 87 (12) : 1265 - 1272
  • [4] Frisby Davis distance stereoacuity values in visually normal children
    Adams, WE
    Hrisos, S
    Richardson, S
    Davis, H
    Frisby, JP
    Clarke, MP
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (11) : 1438 - 1441
  • [5] New tests of distance stereoacuity and their role in evaluating intermittent exotropia
    Holmes, Jonathan M.
    Birch, Eileen E.
    Leske, David A.
    Fu, Valeria L.
    Mohney, Brian G.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (06) : 1215 - 1220
  • [6] Evaluation of distance and near stereoacuity and fusional vergence in intermittent exotropia
    Sharma, Pradeep
    Saxena, Rohit
    Narvekar, Makarand
    Gadia, Ritu
    Menon, Vimla
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 56 (02) : 121 - 125
  • [7] Randot Stereoacuity does not accurately predict ability to perform two practical tests of depth perception at a near distance
    Long, J
    Siu, C
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2005, 82 (10) : 912 - 915
  • [8] Reliability of near stereoacuity tests: Titmus, Randot, TNO, and Frisby
    Cirac, E.
    Jarabo, S.
    Sanchez-Cano, A.
    [J]. OPTICA PURA Y APLICADA, 2016, 49 (02): : 101 - 107
  • [9] Evaluation of distance and near stereoacuity and fusional vergence in intermittent exotropia
    Pandey, Pramod Kumar
    Vats, Pankaj
    Amar, Ashish
    Lain, Pooja
    Bansal, Yuvika
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 57 (01) : 71 - 71
  • [10] Near and Distance Stereoacuity in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma
    Park, Chan Keum
    Kim, Dai Woo
    Lee, Chang Kyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2018, 27 (06) : 537 - 542