Outcome Analysis of Locking Plate Fixation in Proximal Humerus Fracture

被引:33
|
作者
Vijayvargiya, Mayank [1 ]
Pathak, Abhishek [1 ]
Gaur, Sanjiv [1 ]
机构
[1] Gandhi Med Coll, Dept Orthoped, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Approach; Complication; Constant score; Osteoporosis;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2016/18122.8281
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Proximal humerus fractures account for approximately 5% of all fractures. Stable minimally displaced fractures can be treated nonoperatively but the management of displaced fractures remain controversial with various modalities of treatment available. Locking plates provide stable fixation and enable early postoperative mobilization specially in osteoporotic proximal humerus fracture. Aim: To evaluate the functional outcome of locking plate fixation and to compare the results of two approaches used for fixation. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary level hospital between September 2011 to December 2013. PHILOS plates were used for internal fixation of displaced proximal humerus fractures Neer's type 2 part, 3 part and 4 part fractures on 26 patients (M/F ratio 1.36:1; mean age 46 years). According to Neer classification, 5,12 and 9 patients had displaced 2, 3 and 4 part fractures respectively. Deltopectoral and deltoid splitting approaches were used for fixation on 13 patients each. Functional outcome was assessed using Constant-Murley shoulder score. Graphpad software version 6.0 was used with Chi-square test and Fisher-exact test are used to compare data. The p-value<0.05 is considered significant. Results: Of the 26 patients, all fractures united radiologically and clinically and average constant score at final follow-up was 72.5. At the final follow-up 8 patients had good score, 10 patients had moderate score, 6 patients had excellent outcome and 2 patients had poor outcome according to Constant score. Mean time to union was 12.3 weeks (9 -15 weeks). Four complications (15.4%) were encountered, 2 cases of varus malunion, 1 case of wound infection which required wound debridement and 1 case of screw cut-out in which screw removal was done. Mean constant score in delto splitting approach was 70.9 and 74 in deltopectoral group (p-value= 0.54). No significant difference existed in constant score in 2 approaches. No significant difference existed between groups in terms of complications (P>.05) and all fractures were united. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that locking plate fixation gives good functional outcomes in treatment of proximal humerus fractures. There was no significant difference in the two approaches used for exposure. Our results are comparable to various studies conducted by other authors which states that locking plates provide better functional and radiological outcomes as compared to other fixation methods like Tension band wiring, percutaneous K-wire fixation, non-locking plates, intramedullary nails.
引用
收藏
页码:RC1 / RC5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus
    Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
    Braunstein, Volker
    Kirchhoff, Sonja
    Sprecher, Christoph M.
    Ockert, Ben
    Fischer, Florian
    Leidel, Bernd A.
    Biberthaler, Peter
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [2] Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus
    Chlodwig Kirchhoff
    Volker Braunstein
    Sonja Kirchhoff
    Christoph M Sprecher
    Ben Ockert
    Florian Fischer
    Bernd A Leidel
    Peter Biberthaler
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9
  • [3] Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome
    Jost, Bernhard
    Spross, Christian
    Grehn, Holger
    Gerber, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (04) : 542 - 549
  • [4] Locking Plate Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures
    Strohm, Peter C.
    Koestler, Wolfgang
    Suedkamp, Norbert P.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2005, 6 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [5] Locking Plate Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures
    Burke, Neil G.
    Kennedy, Jim
    Green, Connor
    Dodds, Michael K.
    Mullett, Hannan
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (02) : E250 - E254
  • [6] Principles of Locking Plate Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures
    Omid, Reza
    Trasolini, Nicholas A.
    Stone, Michael A.
    Namdari, Surena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2021, 29 (11) : E523 - E535
  • [7] To Detect the Outcome of Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated With a Locking Proximal Humerus Plate
    Ahmed, Nasir
    Khan, Tarique Ali
    Anwar, Muhammad Absar
    Ali, Ahmed
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2015, 9 (01): : 281 - 285
  • [8] Fixation of a Proximal Humerus Fracture Using a Polyaxial Locking Plate and Endosteal Fibular Strut
    Shah, Kalpit N.
    Sobel, Andrew D.
    Paxton, E. Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2018, 32 : S8 - S9
  • [9] MANAGEMENT OF PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURE WITH LOCKING COMPRESSION PLATE
    Shivananda, S.
    Radhakrishna, A. M.
    Kumar, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2014, 3 (14): : 3714 - 3720
  • [10] Pitfalls and complications with locking plate for proximal humerus fracture
    Clavert, Philippe
    Adam, Philippe
    Bevort, Adrien
    Bonnomet, Francois
    Kempf, Jean-Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2010, 19 (04) : 489 - 494