Myth and the small war tradition: Reassessing the discourse of British counter-insurgency

被引:11
|
作者
Jones, David [1 ]
Smith, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Polit Sci & Int Studies, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Kings Coll London, Dept War Studies, Strateg Theory, London, England
来源
SMALL WARS AND INSURGENCIES | 2013年 / 24卷 / 03期
关键词
Basra; British Army Field Manual-Volume V; British COIN; Charles Callwell; Charles Gwynn; Helmand; Frank Ledwidge; Mike Jackson; Robert Thompson; Suez crisis;
D O I
10.1080/09592318.2013.802604
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
In recent years a number of commentators have posited that the British reputation for conducting small wars has suffered in the wake of setbacks in Iraq and Afghanistan. The argument here contests whether such a tradition can be truly said to have ever existed. A close examination of this supposed tradition reveals it to be a myth. In fact, rarely have the British armed forces claimed a facility for counter-insurgency or small war. Invariably, commentators outside the Army have ascribed the tradition to them. Most notably, commentators in the United States keen to discern practices of minimum force or rapid institutional learning generated the narrative of British COIN expertise. Ultimately, what this myth reveals is that, when deconstructed, it is political will, not an ingrained understanding of fighting insurgencies, that has determined Britain's success, or otherwise, in so-called small wars.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 464
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条