1967 PATENT LAW DEBATE - 1ST-TO-INVENT VS 1ST-TO-FILE

被引：0

作者：

FROST, GE ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] GM CORP,PATENT SECT,DETROIT,MI

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：923 / 942

页数：20

共 50 条

[1] RETHINKING 1ST-TO-INVENT
MCCORMICK, D
[J]. BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 10 (11): : 1383 - 1383
[2] ASSESSING A 1ST-TO-FILE PATENT SYSTEM
BURKE, DP
MCGOUGH, KJ
[J]. BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 11 (01): : 30 - 31
[3] CASE FOR 1ST-TO-FILE PATENT SYSTEM
VOYTECH, CF
[J]. AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1968, 54 (OCT): : 989 - 991
[4] A REEXAMINATION OF 1ST-TO-INVENT - COMMENT
MORTON, WB
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE SOCIETY, 1987, 69 (05): : 289 - 290
[5] 1ST-TO-FILE - HARMONIZATION OR HEARTBURN
VOSS, D
[J]. PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 1992, 26 (11) : 78 - &
[6] WHY NOT A 1ST-TO-FILE SYSTEM
GOLDSMITH, H
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE PATENT OFFICE SOCIETY, 1967, 49 (10): : 699 - 712
[7] CONSTITUTIONALITY OF 1ST-TO-FILE SYSTEM
DAVIDSON, RM
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE PATENT OFFICE SOCIETY, 1967, 49 (12): : 890 - 903
[8] 1ST TO FILE VS 1ST TO INVENT, OR SHOULD WE ALSO CHANGE MINING LAW, WATER LAW AND TRADEMARK LAW
DRAKE, HH
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE SOCIETY, 1987, 69 (03): : 167 - 170
[9] REFORM OF THE LAW ON INTERFERENCE - A NEW ROLE FOR AN ANCIENT INSTITUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF A 1ST-TO-FILE SYSTEM
ARMITAGE, RA
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE PATENT OFFICE SOCIETY, 1982, 64 (12): : 663 - 698
[10] WHY 1ST-TO-FILE SHOULD NOT MEAN THE END OF INTERFERENCES - COMMENT
GHOLZ, CL
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE SOCIETY, 1987, 69 (12): : 711 - 716