Skeletal anchored maxillary protraction for midface deficiency in children and early adolescents with Class III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Major, Michael P. [1 ]
Wong, Justin K. [1 ]
Saltaji, Humam [1 ]
Major, Paul W. [1 ]
Flores-Mir, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Dent, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Adolescents; Class III malocclusion; Children; Maxillary protraction; Orthodontics; Skeletal anchorage;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejwf.2012.07.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Unwanted dental movement limits orthopedic efficacy of dental anchored maxillary protraction (DAMP) for growing individuals with Class III malocclusion. Objectives: Meta-analysis to assess the effects of skeletal anchored maxillary protraction (SAMP) with extra-oral (E-SAMP) or intra-oral (I-SAMP) anchorage for midface deficiency. The efficacy of SAMP versus DAMP was also compared. Data sources: Electronic databases were used to search from inception to June 2012; grey literature and bibliographies of relevant publications were also reviewed. Study Selection: Clinical studies of SAMP compared with DAMP or their own changes in children/early adolescents with midface deficient Class III malocclusion. Data Synthesis: A fixed effects model meta-analysis using an inverse variance weighted method was used for homogenous-pooled variables. For heterogeneous pooled variables, random effects model was used. Results: Two E-SAMP clinical trials, 1 I-SAMP clinical trial in two publications, and 10 case reports/case series were included. With E-SAMP, approximately 3 mm of maxillary advancement (Delta A-NtF = 2.9 mm; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-3.8) was reported without dental compensation (Delta U1 = -0.3 degrees; 95% confidence interval, -4.4 to 3.7). I-SAMP clinical trials were not included in pooling (due to incompatible cephalometric analysis), which suggested 4 to 5 mm of maxillary change. Treatment efficacy may be underestimated by E-SAMP clinical trials due to selection bias (participants with too mild Class III malocclusion). Compared with DAMP, E-SAMP achieved the same clinical endpoint of positive overjet (P = 0.773), but with 1 mm more skeletal change (P = 0.015), and likely less dental changes (P = 0.075). Conclusions: Clinicians can expect greater orthopedic change, likely with fewer dental changes using SAMP. (C) 2012 World Federation of Orthodontists. (C) 2012 World Federation of Orthodontists.
引用
收藏
页码:E47 / E54
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yifan Lin
    Runzhi Guo
    Liyu Hou
    Zhen Fu
    Weiran Li
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018, 22 : 2639 - 2652
  • [2] Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin, Yifan
    Guo, Runzhi
    Hou, Liyu
    Fu, Zhen
    Li, Weiran
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (07) : 2639 - 2652
  • [3] Clinical effectiveness of different types of bone- anchored maxillary protraction devices for skeletal Class III malocclusion: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Wang, Jiangwei
    Yang, Yingying
    Wang, Yingxue
    Zhang, Lu
    Ji, Wei
    Hong, Zheng
    Zhang, Linkun
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 52 (05) : 313 - 323
  • [4] Impact of digital orthodontics on maxillary protraction with implants in children with skeletal class III: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alzahrani, Fawaz Hassan
    Devanna, Raghu
    Althomali, Yousef
    Felemban, Nayef Hassan
    Battepati, Prashant Manjunath
    Holenarasipur, Amith V.
    [J]. SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (02) : 240 - 248
  • [5] Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cordasco, G.
    Matarese, G.
    Rustico, L.
    Fastuca, S.
    Caprioglio, A.
    Lindauer, S. J.
    Nucera, R.
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2014, 17 (03) : 133 - 143
  • [6] Clinical effects of maxillary protraction in different stages of dentition in skeletal class III children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jiangwei
    Wang, Yingxue
    Yang, Yingying
    Zhang, Lu
    Hong, Zheng
    Ji, Wei
    Zhang, Linkun
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (04) : 549 - 561
  • [7] Comparative efficacy of the bone-anchored maxillary protraction protocols for orthopaedic treatment in skeletal Class III malocclusion: A Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Hu, Shoushan
    An, Ke
    Peng, Yiran
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (02) : 243 - 250
  • [8] A Bayesian network meta-analysis of orthopaedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: Maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage or a rapid maxillary expander
    Wu, Zuping
    Zhang, Xin
    Li, Zixuan
    Liu, Yuyao
    Jin, Hairu
    Chen, Qian
    Guo, Jie
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2020, 23 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [9] The effectiveness of alternating rapid maxillary expansion and constriction combined with maxillary protraction in the treatment of patients with a class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Almuzian, Mohammed
    McConnell, Elise
    Darendeliler, M. Ali
    Alharbi, Fahad
    Mohammed, Hisham
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 250 - 259
  • [10] A Study on the skeletal changes in maxillary protraction of the skeletal Class III malocclusion patients
    Lee, YJ
    Chu, KS
    Lee, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B321 - B321