Safety Profile Assessment: An online tool to gauge safety-critical performance in radiation oncology

被引:14
|
作者
Dunscombe, Peter [1 ]
Brown, Derek [2 ]
Donaldson, Holly [3 ]
Greener, Anne [4 ]
O'Neill, Michael [5 ]
Sutlief, Steven [2 ]
Woodward, Michael [6 ]
Yorke, Ellen [7 ]
Ford, Eric [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Radiat Med & Appl Sci, La Jolla, CA USA
[3] Australasian Coll Emergency Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Vet Affairs New Jersey Hlth Care Syst, Radiat Oncol Serv, E Orange, NJ USA
[5] Lynchburg Radiat Oncol Associates, Lynchburg, VA USA
[6] Amer Assoc Physicists Med, College Pk, MD USA
[7] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY USA
[8] Univ Washington, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1959 NE Pacific St,Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2014.10.012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: It is challenging for the radiation oncology practitioner to manage and implement the plethora of recently generated recommendations on quality and safety improvement. The online Safety Profile Assessment (SPA) tool uses an easy-to-use question-and-answer format to assess safety/quality within a clinic, provide a way to benchmark against peers, and facilitate improvement. This report describes the design and development of the SPA and experience from the first year of use. Methods: Performance indicators for the SPA were derived from 4 foundations: the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, a review of 7 recent authoritative documents specific to radiation oncology, a recent American Association of Physicists in Medicine report on incident learning, and the American College of Radiology-American Society for Radiation Oncology accreditation system as of 2011. After pilot testing, the free-access tool was launched through the American Association of Physicists in Medicine website (http://spa.aapm.org) in July 2013. Questionnaire data were collected to assess the experience of users. Results: The SPA tool consists of 92 indicators designed to probe safety and quality. A clinic's performance is benchmarked against all other responses in the database, and aided by a downloadable log, quality/safety improvement strategies can be developed and tracked over time. At the time this paper was written, 279 individuals had registered, and 107 had completed the SPA. On average, the SPA required 1.3 hours to complete. The majority of respondents to the questionnaire (56%) completed the SPA with amultidisciplinary group of 4 people on average. Respondents noted that the SPA was easy or very easy to use (70%) and that they would definitely or very probably complete it again (63%). Conclusions: SPA provides a straightforward means of gauging a clinic's performance in key safety-critical areas and has been evaluated favorably by the first cohort of users. The tool has been qualified by the American Board of Radiology (ABR) as meeting the criteria for Practice Quality Improvement requirements of the ABR Maintenance of Certification Program. (C) 2015 TheAuthors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 134
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patterns of practice for safety-critical processes in radiation oncology in the United States from the AAPM safety profile assessment survey
    Ford, Eric C.
    Brown, Derek
    Donaldson, Holly
    Greener, Anne
    O'Neill, Michael
    Sutlief, Steven
    Woodward, Michael
    Yorke, Ellen
    Dunscombe, Peter
    [J]. PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5 (05) : E423 - E429
  • [2] Design tool assessment for safety-critical software development
    Kornecki, AJ
    Zalewski, J
    [J]. 28TH ANNUAL NASA GODDARD SOFTWARE ENGINEERING WORKSHOP, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 105 - 113
  • [3] The quantitative safety assessment for safety-critical software
    Yu, YY
    Johnson, BW
    [J]. 29th Annual IEEE/NASA Software Engineering Workshop, Proceedings, 2005, : 150 - 159
  • [4] ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY-CRITICAL SPECIFICATIONS
    WILLIAMS, LG
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 1994, 11 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [5] Indicators of Safety-Critical Events in Radiation Oncology Derived From the Oncology Information System
    Hartvigson, P.
    Gensheimer, M. F.
    Evans, K. T.
    Carlson, J.
    Ford, E. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : S72 - S73
  • [6] Formal specification as a tool for objective assessment of safety-critical interactive systems
    Palanque, P
    Bastide, R
    Paterno, F
    [J]. HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT '97, 1997, : 323 - 330
  • [7] Safety-Critical Online Control with Adversarial Disturbances
    Ramasubramanian, Bhaskar
    Xiao, Baicen
    Bushnell, Linda
    Poovendran, Radha
    [J]. 2020 59TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2020, : 3731 - 3738
  • [8] Safety Assessment of Design Patterns for Safety-Critical Embedded Systems
    Armoush, Ashraf
    Beckschulze, Eva
    Kowalewski, Stefan
    [J]. 2009 35TH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 523 - 527
  • [9] Checklist: A Tool for Safety in Radiation Oncology
    Hand, C.
    Sullivan, P.
    Hasson, B.
    Yeager, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [10] Languages for safety-critical software: Issues and assessment
    Brosgol, Benjamin M.
    [J]. 29th International Conference on Software Engineering: ICSE 2007 Companion Volume, Proceedings, 2007, : 180 - 181