POST-HUMAN AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH: HOW ENGINEERING CARRIED OUT THE PROJECT

被引:0
|
作者
Ghilardi, Giampaolo [1 ]
Accoto, Dino [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campus Bio Med Roma, FAST Ist Filosofia Agire Sci & Tecnol, Via Alvaro Portillo,21, I-00128 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Campus Bio Med Roma, Biomed Engn, I-00128 Rome, Italy
来源
CUADERNOS DE BIOETICA | 2014年 / 25卷 / 85期
关键词
Robotics; roboethics; embodied intelligence; free will; ontological; participation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We start with a definition of robot in order to understand which are legitimate robotics' objectives. Then it is provided an outline of new robot generations and their industrial and biomedical applications. We consider the consequences of this new kind of technology on the notion of intelligence, stressing how the exteroceptive sensor systems provide a new bottom up approach to the AI debate. We consider three challenges Robotics have to face nowadays. First materials and components, which are built with technologies top-down, set huge limits in terms of weight, speed, safety and cost, not to mention reliability and durability. Second the metholdological aspects: the challenge concerns the management of complexity. How to achieve intelligent and adaptive behaviors out of the control system of the robot, which must remain intrisically simple? A third issue we address is the cultural one: the unreasonable expectations of the general public often provoked by a misunderstanding of the notion of intelligence itself. We consider then what makes human specifically human from a broader philosophic point of view, pointing out how the will is strangely absent in the AI debate. We show three advantages connected with this different perspective instead of the classical one intellect centered. First, while intellect is not used only by man, will is. Second, desire involves intellect while the reciprocal is not necessarily true. Third, looking at robotics and more specifically to cybernetics the key concept of these fields are control and govenrance, whereas both of them are specifically relate to the domain of will rather than intellect. We look then into the concept of participation as essential to the understanding of the notion of will, to overcome some roboethics' issues related to the adoption of the still dominant rationalitsic paradigm.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 386
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条