PECULIARITY OF SOFTWARE SELECTION FOR TRAINING OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN

被引:1
|
作者
Shpagin, Victor F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Taras Shevchenko Natl Univ Kyiv, Inst Biol & Med, Educ & Sci Ctr, Dept Plant Biol, Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
landscape architecture; landscape design; BIM; BIM-applications; Autodesk Revit; Graphisoft ArchiCAD; Trimble SketchUp;
D O I
10.33407/itlt.v68i6.2152
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The article deals with the main problems and trends in development of software for landscape design in the context of accelerated introduction of BIM-technologies into the building and construction industry. It is shown that there is currently a significant lag in the development of computer BIM-products for landscape architects. The principal requirements which the modern BIM applications for landscape architects should meet and basic problems of their implementation are determined. It is argued that the decision to create a BIM application for landscape architects is possible the only by the world's leading developers of software products for the construction trade, such as Autodesk Inc. and Nemetschek and Trimble companies. It is also shown that all these developers are actively working towards improvement their existing architectural BIM applications in order to provide the possibility of their usage in landscape design. Analysis of the differences in the basic approaches used by the developers for this purpose revealed that Autodesk and Nemetschek prefer to improve their Autodesk Revit and Graphisoft ArchiCAD products, respectively, without engagement the third party developers whereas Trimble took approach with active participation of third parties - plug-ins developers to the SketchUp application. The conclusion of the article is that Autodesk Revit, Graphisoft ArchiCAD and Trimble SketchUp are promising applications for landscape design and, accordingly, for introducing them into the teaching process of colleges and universities. At the same time, it is revealed that the above-described approach by Trimble opens the prospect of the fastest conversion of SketchUp into a full-fledged BIM tool for landscape architects, and this should be taken into account when choosing an application for introducing into the educative process.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 192
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flat Finishing Skill Training Software System Based on Personal Peculiarity Classification
    Teranishi, Masaru
    Matsumoto, Shinpei
    Takeno, Hidetoshi
    [J]. NEW TRENDS IN INTELLIGENT SOFTWARE METHODOLOGIES, TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES, 2017, 297 : 65 - 72
  • [2] Approaches to the design of software training
    Bannert, M
    Reimann, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2000, 16 (04) : 281 - 283
  • [3] THE SELECTION OF PROJECTS FOR LANDSCAPE DESIGN CLASSES
    HAQUE, MBT
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 1982, 17 (02) : 151 - 151
  • [4] LANDSCAPE DESIGN STUDENTS TO USE COMPUTER SOFTWARE
    PEDERSEN, BW
    [J]. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE TEACHERS OF AGRICULTURE JOURNAL, 1984, 28 (02): : 39 - 41
  • [5] Daring digital design (Software for landscape architects)
    Hammatt, H
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, 2002, 92 (07): : 94 - +
  • [6] Analysis of the Peculiarity of the Japanese Software Development Style in Offshore Software Development
    Yoshii, Asa
    Higa, Kunihiko
    [J]. IEEJ TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2011, 6 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [7] A training sample selection method for predicting software defects
    Jin, Cong
    [J]. APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 53 (10) : 12015 - 12031
  • [8] A training sample selection method for predicting software defects
    Cong Jin
    [J]. Applied Intelligence, 2023, 53 : 12015 - 12031
  • [9] Road design software - New opportunities for landscape architects
    Sipes, JL
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, 2001, 91 (07): : 42 - +
  • [10] Section Selection Software Design for Submarine Cables
    Li, Meng
    Niu, Sheng-suo
    Song, Yan
    Jia, Xu-ce
    Liu, Yu-qin
    Zhao, Ke-wei
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIALS SCIENCE, ENERGY TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (MSETEE 2017), 2017, 81