PERFORMANCE OF A DIRECT, IMMUNOSEPARATION BASED LDL-CHOLESTEROL METHOD COMPARED TO FRIEDEWALD CALCULATION AND A POLYVINYL SULFATE PRECIPITATION METHOD

被引:0
|
作者
COBBAERT, C
BROODMAN, I
SWART, GR
HOOGERBRUGGE, N
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP DIJKZIGT,DEPT CLIN CHEM,3015 GD ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV HOSP DIJKZIGT,LIPID REFERENCE LAB,3015 GD ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[3] UNIV HOSP DIJKZIGT,DEPT INTERNAL MED 2,3015 GD ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[4] UNIV HOSP DIJKZIGT,DEPT INTERNAL MED 3,3015 GD ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[5] UNIV HOSP DIJKZIGT,LIPID CLIN,3015 GD ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The analytical performance of a direct, immunoseparation based LDL-cholesterol method (Genzyme Corporation) was evaluated on an ELAN analyser (Merck), and compared with the performance of routinely used methods (LDL-cholesterol estimated by the Friedewald equation, and LDL-cholesterol obtained after polyvinyl sulphate precipitation). Within-day coefficients of variation (CVs) were 0.79 to 2.51% for immunoseparation based LDL-cholesterol; the between-day CVs varied between 2.62 and 3.89%, i.e. within the recommended National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goal of < 4%. A method comparison study, according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) EP9-P guidelines, was performed using fasting normo- and hypertriacylglycerolaemic as well as cholestatic sera. In fresh normotriacylglycerolaemic sera immunoseparation based LDL-cholesterol (y) and Friedewald LDL-cholesterol (x) values were identical as slope and intercept of the Passing and Bablok regression equation were not significantly different from one and zero, respectively (y = 1.006 x -0.107; N = 45). In contrast, immunoseparation based LDL-cholesterol (y) differed significantly from polyvinyl sulphate LDL-cholesterol (x) results (y = 0.922 x +0.234; N = 103). Freezing normotriacylglycerolaemic sera (three weeks, -20 degrees C) resulted in a negative bias of -5.8% for the immunoseparation based LDL-cholesterol method, and in a positive bias of +5.3% for the polyvinyl sulphate method, compared to fresh specimens. Immunoseparated LDL-cholesterol was completely recovered up to at least 37.84 mmol/l serum triacylglycerols. We conclude that the immunoseparation based LDL-cholesterol method is a practical, not technically demanding technique well applicable within routine clinical laboratories. The method shows a markedly improved analytical precision in comparison to current routine methods, and hence has potential to decrease total test imprecision. The immunoseparation based LDL-cholesterol method produces results identical to those obtained by Friedewald in healthy blood donors, and above all overcomes a major pitfall of the Friedewald equation enabling LDL-cholesterol measurements in hypertriacylglycerolaemic sera. Its acceptance should improve the reliability of LDL-cholesterol testing and improve clinical decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 424
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Comparison of LDL-cholesterol concentration measured by direct method and Friedewald's formula calculation
    Ferenec-Ruzic, D
    Kvaternik, M
    Topic, E
    Margetic, S
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 51 : A135 - A135
  • [2] Performance of a direct LDL-cholesterol method compared to beta quantification
    Pisani, T
    Pickering, S
    DeLuca, LW
    Gebski, CP
    [J]. PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 1996, 68 (10) : 1887 - 1892
  • [3] Friedewald's Method underestimates LDL-Cholesterol even at Lower Range of Triglyceride
    Chaudhari, R. K.
    Rajendra, K. C.
    Khan, S. A.
    Lal Das, B. K.
    Majhi, S.
    Lamsal, M.
    Baral, N.
    [J]. RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 6 (01): : 787 - 792
  • [4] A SIMPLE METHOD BASED ON PRECIPITATION FOR THE QUANTITATIVE-DETERMINATION OF LDL-CHOLESTEROL
    MERTZ, DP
    THUILOT, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1986, 24 (05): : 355 - 357
  • [5] Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, or Sampson/NIH: Which is the Best Method to Estimate LDL-Cholesterol?
    Cesena, Fernando
    [J]. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2022, 119 (02) : 234 - 235
  • [6] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ESTIMATION OF LDL CHOLESTEROL BY THE DIRECT METHOD AND FRIEDEWALD EQUATION IN SECONDARY HYPERLIPIDEMIA
    Ilanchezhian, T.
    Vanaja, R.
    Rajagopalan, Balaji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH, 2016, 7 (11): : 4632 - 4636
  • [7] Analytical and clinical performance of a homogeneous enzymatic LDL-cholesterol assay compared with the ultracentrifugation-dextran sulfate-Mg2+ method
    Rifai, N
    Iannotti, E
    DeAngelis, K
    Law, T
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 44 (06) : 1242 - 1250
  • [8] Analytical and clinical performance of the N-geneous LDL-cholesterol assay compared with the ultracentrifugation-dextran sulfate-Mg++ method.
    Law, T
    Iannotti, E
    DeAngelis, K
    Rifai, N
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 44 : A79 - A80
  • [9] Comparison of direct measurement by immunoseparation and high performance gel chromatography methods for determination of plasma LDL-cholesterol in cynomolgus monkeys.
    Thudium, DT
    Althouse, DC
    Smith, KS
    Waites, CR
    Rhodes, DC
    Gossett, KA
    Kerns, WD
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 43 : 407 - 407
  • [10] Estimation of LDL cholesterol concentration by direct assay compared to Friedewald's formula calculation in patients from lipid clinics
    Dubska, L
    Dvorakova, J
    Hyanek, J
    Taborsky, L
    [J]. EUROMEDLAB 2003: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH IFCC-FESCC EUROPEAN CONGRESS OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2003, : 331 - 334