Chevron Bangladesh Block Twelve, Ltd. and Chevron Bangladesh Blocks Thirteen and Fourteen, Ltd. v. People's Republic of Bangladesh (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/10): Introductory Note

被引：1

|

作者：

Marchessault, Lindsey ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] ICSID, Washington, DC 20433 USA

来源：

ICSID REVIEW-FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW JOURNAL | 2011年 / 26卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1093/icsidreview/26.1.256

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

收藏

页码：256 / 264

页数：9

相关论文

共 3 条

[1] CHEVRON BANGLADESH BLOCK TWELVE, LTD. AND CHEVRON BANGLADESH BLOCKS THIRTEEN AND FOURTEEN, LTD. (CLAIMANTS) AND PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH (RESPONDENT) (ICSID CASE No. ARB/06/10) AWARD
Buergenthal, Thomas
Beechey, John
Nariman, Fali S.
Onwuamaegbu, Ucheora
Nitschke, Frauke
ICSID REVIEW-FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW JOURNAL, 2011, 26 (01) : 265 - 294
[2] Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S. A. and Vivendi Universal S. A v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19) Introductory Note
Flores, Gonzalo
ICSID REVIEW-FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW JOURNAL, 2006, 21 (01) : 339 - 341
[3] Case Note on “Orange”: Trade Mark Law No. 17/2001, Arts. 4.1, 4.2(b), 5.1(a), 5.1(b) – Orange Personal Communications Ltd. v. Spain/Jazz Telecom, S.A.U
Flores A.
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2014, 45 (5) : 612 - 613