Reporting of adverse effects in randomised clinical trials of chiropractic manipulations: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Ernst, Edzard [1 ]
Posadzki, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter Plymouth, Peninsula Med Sch, Complementary Med, Exeter EX2 4SG, Devon, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To systematically review the reporting of adverse effects in clinical trials of chiropractic manipulation. Data sources Six databases were searched from 2000 to July 2011. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were considered, if they tested chiropractic manipulations against any control intervention in human patients suffering from any type of clinical condition. The selection of studies, data extraction, and validation were performed independently by two reviewers. Results Sixty RCTs had been published. Twenty-nine RCTs did not mention adverse effects at all. Sixteen RCTs reported that no adverse effects had occurred. Complete information on incidence, severity, duration, frequency and method of reporting of adverse effects was included in only one RCT. Conflicts of interests were not mentioned by the majority of authors. Conclusions Adverse effects are poorly reported in recent RCTs of chiropractic manipulations.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 140
页数:54
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reporting of adverse events associated with spinal manipulation in randomised clinical trials: an updated systematic review
    Gorrell, Lindsay M.
    Brown, Benjamin T.
    Engel, Roger
    Lystad, Reidar P.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [2] Chiropractic spinal manipulation for infant colic: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials
    Ernst, E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 63 (09) : 1351 - 1353
  • [3] Reporting of Psychiatric Adverse Events in Randomised Clinical Trials
    Willemen, M. J. C.
    Mantel-Teeuwisse, A. K.
    Straus, S. M. J. M.
    Egberts, A. C. G.
    Leufkens, H. G. M.
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 33 (10) : 936 - 936
  • [5] Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care
    Young, Amber E.
    Davies, Anna
    Bland, Sophie
    Brookes, Sara
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [6] Analysis of adverse events attribution and reporting in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review
    Enrico, Diego
    Waisberg, Federico
    Burton, Jeannette
    Mando, Pablo
    Chacon, Matias
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 160
  • [7] Effects of reiki in clinical practice: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials
    Lee, M. S.
    Pittler, M. H.
    Ernst, E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 62 (06) : 947 - 954
  • [8] Analysis and reporting of adverse events in randomised controlled trials: a review
    Phillips, Rachel
    Hazell, Lorna
    Sauzet, Odile
    Cornelius, Victoria
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [9] Variation in hyperemesis gravidarum definition and outcome reporting in randomised clinical trials: a systematic review
    Koot, M. H.
    Boelig, R. C.
    van't Hooft, J.
    Limpens, J.
    Roseboom, T. J.
    Painter, R. C.
    Grooten, I. J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (12) : 1514 - 1521
  • [10] Adverse event reporting in nonpharmacologic, noninterventional pain clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review
    Hunsinger, Matthew
    Smith, Shannon M.
    Rothstein, Daniel
    McKeown, Andrew
    Parkhurst, Melissa
    Hertz, Sharon
    Katz, Nathaniel P.
    Lin, Allison H.
    McDermott, Michael P.
    Rappaport, Bob A.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    [J]. PAIN, 2014, 155 (11) : 2253 - 2262