China in a Post-Kyoto Architecture: Reconciling Internal and External Pressures

被引:0
|
作者
Meidan, Michal
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The questions of climate change and environmental protection are now a clear component of Beijing's official rhetoric. Already taken into account in the Tenth Five-Year Plan (2000-2005) with few concrete results, the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency and conservation have become some of the leading priorities in the roadmap set down by the government for 2006-2011. Despite the scientific uncertainties surrounding the question((1)), there is no longer any doubt in China that the country's exponential economic growth is a major contributor to the degradation of the natural environment.((2))
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 71
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Post-Kyoto
    Ghezloun, A.
    Saidane, A.
    Oucher, N.
    Chergui, S.
    [J]. TERRAGREEN 13 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2013 - ADVANCEMENTS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY AND CLEAN ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 36 : 1 - 8
  • [2] An international policy architecture for the post-Kyoto era
    Olmstead, Sheila M.
    Stavins, Robert N.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (02): : 35 - 38
  • [3] An International Policy Architecture for the Post-Kyoto Era
    Stavins, Robert N.
    [J]. GLOBAL WARMING: LOOKING BEYOND KYOTO, 2008, : 145 - 153
  • [4] Post-Kyoto agendas
    不详
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 390 (6661) : 647 - 647
  • [5] Post-Kyoto agendas
    [J]. Nature, 1997, 390 : 647 - 647
  • [6] Values for a post-Kyoto discourse
    Jon Rosales
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2008, 88 : 93 - 111
  • [7] Game Analysis of Kyoto and Post-Kyoto Schemes
    Imai, Haruo
    [J]. GLOBAL WARMING: ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, 2010, : 407 - 421
  • [8] The post-Kyoto economy of Russia
    Fedorov B.G.
    [J]. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2007, 18 (4) : 391 - 396
  • [9] Values for a post-Kyoto discourse
    Rosales, Jon
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2008, 88 (02) : 93 - 111
  • [10] Post-Kyoto international climate policy
    Layfield, David
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2010, 19 (04) : 657 - 661