Alternative futures of global governance: scenarios and perspectives from the Global South

被引:6
|
作者
Cruz, Shermon O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Philippine Ctr Foresight Educ & Innovat Res, Laoag City, Philippines
来源
FORESIGHT | 2015年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
Transformation; Global governance; Alternative futures; Emerging issues; Futures triangle; Global South; Non-state actors;
D O I
10.1108/FS-05-2014-0030
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical and informative exploration of the emerging roles and rising influence of the Global South in shaping the future of global governance. Specifically, it inquires into the following questions: How is the Global South impacting the way we govern globally? What are the pushers, pulls and weights to the futures of global governance? Using Jim Dator's alternative futures archetype, what is the future of global governance? What are the emerging issues and trends? Design/methodology/approach - It uses Sohail Inayatullah's futures triangle to map the drivers - the pushes, pulls and weights of global governance and Jim Dator's archetypes - continued economic growth, collapse, conserver and transformation - to imagine and construct alternative futures of global governance. Findings - The futures triangle analysis maps and reveals three diverse but causally linked Global South narratives of global governance. The pulls of the future include the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa leading the way, and emerging economies reinforcing the pluralization of global governance discourses and systems. New governance regimes create new global governance dynamics and North - South relations. Their increasing social, political and economic clout leads to new governance structures. The Global South's rising human development index, economic growth, decreasing financial reliance, the rise of minilateralism and South - South cooperation is a push of the present. Weights are recurring financial constraints, their lack of technical capacity, existing international laws, stagnating bureaucracy, poverty, domestic issues and state centrism (among others). Four alternative global governance scenarios emerge: a harmonious world is everybody's business - a state-centric and economic growth global governance future. Here, the dynamics of global governance remain the same as zero-sum thinking informs the rules of the game. In dangerous transitions and the rise of the rest, however, the status quo is disrupted as power shifts rapidly and detrimentally. Then, in mosaic of the old structure, the South embraces protectionism, and the old vanguards return. Finally, in all boats rise substantially, power is redistributed as emerging states gain larger, formal (and informal) leadership roles in global governance. The global world order is re-designed for the Global South. A world parliament is created and stronger regional confederation or unions emerge. Research limitations/implications - This paper extensively utilizes existing and emerging literature, official reports, blogs,interviews, books and other digital texts on global governance. The sources relevance is analyzed using the futures triangle tool and dissected to present four detailed scenarios using Dator's alternative futures archetype. This study seeks to initially explore alternative futures of global governance from the perspective of the Global South. While some studies have approached the topic, only a few authors have addressed global governance using futures tools and methods. The goal of this research is to map and explore some alternative futures of global governance. The paper is less useful in predicting what lies ahead. Its intention is to highlight the "rise of the different" and to create a space for more meaningful conversations on global governance. Practical implications - This research could provide futurists, policy-makers, international relations scholars and global governance advocates some alternative narratives, frameworks and images of global governance. While it does not offer any specific structures and solutions, it offers a number of emerging issues and perspectives from the Global South that decision- makers and institutions might want to consider as they rethink global governance. Social implications - This paper highlights the emerging roles and perspectives of the Global South in global governance. It identifies some "trading zones" and "emerging issues" that may inspire actors to create new global governance spaces, innovate alternative narratives and design new frameworks of global governance. Originality/value - It maps and constructs some plausible scenarios of global governance that emphasize Global South perspectives while using futures tools and methods.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 142
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global Governance: Three Futures
    Kahler, Miles
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2018, 20 (02) : 239 - 246
  • [2] Rethinking urban environmental and infrastructural governance in the everyday: Perspectives from and of the global South
    Truelove, Yaffa
    Cornea, Natasha
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2021, 39 (02) : 231 - 246
  • [3] Introduction: 'Studying from the margins' - Global South perspectives on the future of Antarctic governance
    Flamm, Patrick
    Verbitsky, Jane
    [J]. POLAR JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [4] Transforming global governance: images of futures from people on the periphery
    Sykes-Kelleher, Anita
    [J]. FORESIGHT, 2015, 17 (02): : 112 - 124
  • [5] Alternative futures for global biological invasions
    Núria Roura-Pascual
    Brian Leung
    Wolfgang Rabitsch
    Lucas Rutting
    Joost Vervoort
    Sven Bacher
    Stefan Dullinger
    Karl-Heinz Erb
    Jonathan M. Jeschke
    Stelios Katsanevakis
    Ingolf Kühn
    Bernd Lenzner
    Andrew M. Liebhold
    Michael Obersteiner
    Anibal Pauchard
    Garry D. Peterson
    Helen E. Roy
    Hanno Seebens
    Marten Winter
    Mark A. Burgman
    Piero Genovesi
    Philip E. Hulme
    Reuben P. Keller
    Guillaume Latombe
    Melodie A. McGeoch
    Gregory M. Ruiz
    Riccardo Scalera
    Michael R. Springborn
    Betsy von Holle
    Franz Essl
    [J]. Sustainability Science, 2021, 16 : 1637 - 1650
  • [6] Locating BRICS in the Global Order: Perspectives from the Global South
    Subba, Bhim B.
    Kumar, Rajan
    Mehra, Meeta Keswani
    Raman, G. VenKat
    Sundriyal, MeenaKshi
    [J]. CHINA REPORT, 2023, 59 (04) : 481 - 484
  • [7] Alternative futures for global biological invasions
    Roura-Pascual, Nuria
    Leung, Brian
    Rabitsch, Wolfgang
    Rutting, Lucas
    Vervoort, Joost
    Bacher, Sven
    Dullinger, Stefan
    Erb, Karl-Heinz
    Jeschke, Jonathan M.
    Katsanevakis, Stelios
    Kuehn, Ingolf
    Lenzner, Bernd
    Liebhold, Andrew M.
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Pauchard, Anibal
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Roy, Helen E.
    Seebens, Hanno
    Winter, Marten
    Burgman, Mark A.
    Genovesi, Piero
    Hulme, Philip E.
    Keller, Reuben P.
    Latombe, Guillaume
    McGeoch, Melodie A.
    Ruiz, Gregory M.
    Scalera, Riccardo
    Springborn, Michael R.
    von Holle, Betsy
    Essl, Franz
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (05) : 1637 - 1650
  • [8] Global collaborative governance: there is no alternative
    Zadek, Simon
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2008, 8 (04): : 374 - +
  • [9] Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives
    Elias, Juanita
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2009, 7 (03) : 416 - 416
  • [10] Perspectives in global environmental governance
    de Oliveira, Jose A. Puppim
    Qian, Haoqi
    [J]. GLOBAL PUBLIC POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2023, 3 (01): : 5 - 11