INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA - IMAGING FEATURES AND CLINICAL DETECTION

被引:84
|
作者
HELVIE, MA
PARAMAGUL, C
OBERMAN, HA
ADLER, DD
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN,MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
[2] UNIV MICHIGAN,MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
关键词
BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS; BREAST ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199303000-00002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Mammographic findings and method of detection of 52 cases of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common breast carcinoma, are reported. METHODS. Preoperative mammograms and clinical records of all patients with ILC not associated with a second mammary carcinoma (other than lobular carcinoma in situ) from 1979-1991 at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS. Abnormal mammographic findings were present in 48/52 (92%) and included irregular spiculated masses (33/52, 63%), asymmetric densities (7/52, 13%), architectural distortion (5/52, 10%), microcalcifications (2/52, 4%), and well circumscribed masses (1/52, 2%). The mean mammographic diameter was 2.1 cm. The tumor was most often best visualized in the craniocaudal projection. At the time of diagnosis, 54% of women had coexistent suggestive breast physical findings and 35% had metastatic carcinoma in axillary lymph nodes. CONCLUSiONS. The infrequency of microcalcifications in pure ILC may hinder mammographic detection and contrasts markedly with ductal carcinoma. Mammography and breast physical examination play complementary roles in the detection of ILC.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 207
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Imaging features of invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Cha, Eun Suk
    Park, Chang Suk
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Whang, In Yong
    Lee, A. Won
    Song, Byung Joo
    Park, Jeongmi
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 29 (07) : 475 - 482
  • [2] Imaging features of invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
    Sung Hun Kim
    Eun Suk Cha
    Chang Suk Park
    Bong Joo Kang
    In Yong Whang
    A. Won Lee
    Byung Joo Song
    Jeongmi Park
    [J]. Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2011, 29 : 475 - 482
  • [3] Imaging Characteristics of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma With Lobular Features
    Arps, David
    Jorns, Julie
    Pang, Judy
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 : 33A - 33A
  • [4] Imaging Characteristics of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma With Lobular Features
    Arps, David
    Jorns, Julie
    Pang, Judy
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 95 : 33A - 33A
  • [5] A comparison of the imaging features of pleomorphic and classical invasive lobular carcinoma
    Phey Ming Yeap
    Andrew Evans
    Colin A. Purdie
    Lee B. Jordan
    Sarah J. Vinnicombe
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 172 : 381 - 389
  • [6] A comparison of the imaging features of pleomorphic and classical invasive lobular carcinoma
    Yeap, Phey Ming
    Evans, Andrew
    Purdie, Colin A.
    Jordan, Lee B.
    Vinnicombe, Sarah J.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 172 (02) : 381 - 389
  • [7] Invasive Ductal Carcinoma with Lobular Features and Invasive Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma - Are They Different Entities?
    Omeroglu, G.
    Hanna, W. M.
    Nofech-Mozes, S.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2009, 89 : 62A - 62A
  • [8] Invasive Ductal Carcinoma with Lobular Features and Invasive Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma - Are They Different Entities?
    Omeroglu, G.
    Hanna, W. M.
    Nofech-Mozes, S.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 22 : 62A - 62A
  • [9] Clinicopathologic features of pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with classic invasive lobular carcinoma
    Kang, S. Hee
    [J]. BREAST, 2017, 32 : S37 - S37
  • [10] Comparison of clinical features and outcomes for pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma vs. non-pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma
    Wright, Matthew D.
    Dempster, Marcus S.
    ElSherif, Ayat
    Cocco, Daniela
    Valente, Stephanie A.
    Li, Hong
    Kruse, Megan L.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (04)