The argumentative and propositional logic in the construction of scientific and philosophical arguments process

被引:0
|
作者
da Silva, Jeane Torres [1 ]
机构
[1] FSDB, Manaus, Estado Do Amazo, Brazil
关键词
Logical reasoning; logical argument; propositional structure; scientific and philosophical text; textual logical sense;
D O I
10.17163/soph.n21.2016.02
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The article presents an epistemological analysis of the contributions of argumentative logic and propositional logic, based on propositional structures that make up the logical arguments, as models for the construction of arguments in scientific and philosophical texts. The aim of the research was to identify the common theoretical perspectives of argumentative logic and propositional logic, which contribute to the cognitive process of logical reasoning and its transposition into logical language, which demonstrate how to use the propositional and argumentative structure in the construction of scientific and philosophical texts, to communicate their ideas with consistency, clarity, objectivity and cohesion. The reasons for the study was derived from the practice of orientation completion works of the undergraduate courses, where it was possible to perceive the difficulties of higher education students to build texts with necessary and sufficient logical consistency to the reader's understanding. The theoretical basis of the research was based on concepts, ideas and theories of philosophers, mathematicians and researchers dedicated to the study of logic, especially Aristotle (2010), Kant (1992), Frege (2009), Copi (1981) and Weston (1996). The methodological approach was ushered by the proceedings of qualitative research, enabling the interpretation of the logical processes that can contribute to the construction of arguments in text scientific-philosophical approach the research was based on the deductive method, with the composition of logical reports arguments and the use of the procedures of observation and literature. The results indicated that the propositional structure of deductive arguments can be used to build logical arguments reports, and useful to synthesize information and communicate ideas and theories, scientific and philosophical texts with levels of greater comprehensibility for the reader.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 81
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC IN A FRAMEWORK OF PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC
    Damboeck, Christian
    LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE, 2009, (205) : 21 - 37
  • [2] Algorithms for generating arguments and counterarguments in propositional logic
    Efstathiou, Vasiliki
    Hunter, Anthony
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2011, 52 (06) : 672 - 704
  • [3] Construction of the graphical propositional logic
    Wang, Yi
    Ding, Han
    Telkomnika - Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2013, 11 (08): : 4260 - 4266
  • [5] Construction of a Bayesian Network as an Extension of Propositional Logic
    Enomoto, Takuto
    Kimura, Masaomi
    2015 7TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (IC3K), 2015, : 211 - 217
  • [6] Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments
    Mota-Rojas, Daniel
    Whittaker, Alexandra L.
    de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo
    Ghezzi, Marcelo
    Lezama-Garcia, Karina
    Dominguez-Oliva, Adriana
    Falcon, Isabel
    Casas-Alvarado, Alejandro
    Alonso-Spilsbury, Maria
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR AND BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2023, 11 (02):
  • [8] PHILOSOPHY AS A RESOURCE - ARGUMENTS FOR THE RELEVANCE OF PHILOSOPHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN SCIENTIFIC PSYCHOLOGY
    GREVE, W
    PSYCHOLOGISCHE RUNDSCHAU, 1994, 45 (01) : 24 - 36
  • [9] There Was No Jesus, There Is No God: A Scholarly Examination of the Scientific, Historical, and Philosophical Arguments For Monotheism
    Cusack, Carole M.
    LITERATURE AND AESTHETICS, 2013, 23 (02): : 144 - 146
  • [10] A Philosophical Treatise on the Connection of Scientific Reasoning with Fuzzy Logic
    Athanassopoulos, Evangelos
    Voskoglou, Michael Gr.
    MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (06)