MODERN ART IN A CONTEXT OF EXHIBITION ART-KYIV CONTEMPORARY

The article is about contemporary art and it's historical and art valid. How can be the contemporary art be written into history? Is the notion of "contemporary art history" or a "history of contemporary art" a contradiction in terms? This article accepts the challenge of exploring the complexities both of contemporary art as a now "historical" phenomenon (as the years between "now" and 1985 expand in number) and of contemporary art as potentially the cutting edge of what people calling themselves artists (or understood by others as such) are making and doing in this increasingly complex and globalized economy of cultural practices. And of course for better understanding there is an investigation of the big exhibition Art-Kyiv Contemporary 2015.