COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ITERATIVE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT MODEL

被引：0
|
作者：
Bragina, T. I. [1 ]
Tabunshchyk, G. V. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Zaporizhzhya Natl Techn Univ, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
[2] Zaporozhye Natl Techn Univ, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
来源：
RADIO ELECTRONICS COMPUTER SCIENCE CONTROL | 2010年 / 2卷
关键词：
software project; quality standards; factors for model selection;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号：
0812 ;
摘要：
The authors have made a review of software projects development models, their life cycle, their advantages and disadvantages. The most common models were analyzed, such as Rational Unified Process, Microsoft Solutions Framework, Personal Software Process/Team Software Process and Agile (eXtreme Programming, Crystal, Feature Driven Development). Conclusions were drawn on the factors which influence the model choice, and recommendations were proposed for appropriate software model selection depending on project characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码：130 / 139
页数：10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Analysis of Agile Methods and Iterative Enhancement Model in Assessment of Software Maintenance
    Malhotra, Ruchika
    Chug, Anuradha
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INDIACOM - 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, : 1271 - 1276
  • [2] Timeboxing: a process model for iterative software development
    Jalote, P
    Palit, A
    Kurien, P
    Peethamber, VT
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2004, 70 (1-2) : 117 - 127
  • [3] The timeboxing process model for iterative software development
    Jalote, P
    Palit, A
    Kurien, P
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTERS, VOL 62: ADVANCES IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2004, 62 : 67 - 103
  • [4] Autonomic Software Development using Iterative Enhancement Model
    Dwivedi, Raghavnedra Kr.
    Srivastava, Awadhesh Kr.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN INTELLIGENT COMPUTING TECHNIQUES (ICICT), 2014, : 672 - 677
  • [5] Super pipelined timeboxing model: A process model for iterative software development
    Dhummad, Sandipsinh G.
    Javiya, Prashant
    Jadeja, Pradhyumansinh U.
    IMECS 2007: INTERNATIONAL MULTICONFERENCE OF ENGINEERS AND COMPUTER SCIENTISTS, VOLS I AND II, 2007, : 1122 - +
  • [6] SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Anghel, Iulia Ioana
    Călin, Roberta Ștefana
    Nedelea, Maria Lavinia
    Stănică, Iulia Cristina
    Tudose, Cătălin
    Boiangiu, Costin Anton
    UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series C: Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2022, 84 (03): : 45 - 58
  • [7] SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Anghel, Julia Ioana
    Calin, Roberta Stefana
    Nedelea, Maria Lavinia
    Stanica, Julia Cristina
    Tudose, Catalin
    Boiangiu, Costin Anton
    UNIVERSITY POLITEHNICA OF BUCHAREST SCIENTIFIC BULLETIN SERIES C-ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2022, 84 (03): : 45 - 58
  • [8] Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis
    Mishra, Alok
    Alzoubi, Yehia Ibrahim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 14 (04) : 1504 - 1522
  • [9] Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis
    Alok Mishra
    Yehia Ibrahim Alzoubi
    International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2023, 14 : 1504 - 1522
  • [10] A comparative analysis of soft computing techniques in software fault prediction model development
    Sharma D.
    Chandra P.
    International Journal of Information Technology, 2019, 11 (1) : 37 - 46
12345