Reply to Critics

被引:0
|
作者
Lindahl, Hans [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Sch Law, Tilburg, Netherlands
来源
ETICA & POLITICA | 2014年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
A-legality; representation; contingency; asymmetrical recognition; authority;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In my reply to critics I address a raft of issues raised by the commentators to Fault Lines of Globalization. These issues include: the radicalization of the Husserlian concept of intentionality as differance; the irreducibility of a-legality to (il) legality; the relation between legal orders and society; legal pluralism; the relation between power and place; contingency and modernity; fear and terrorism; differences and similarities between a discourse theory of law and the approach developed in the book; the incorporation of the findings of social theory into an account of law as authoritative collective action.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1001 / 1025
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条