(HOW) CAN LAW BE LEGITIMATED - HABERMAS, RAWLS, DWORKIN

被引：0
|
作者：
NAGL, L
机构：
来源：
FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK-ACTA PHILOSOPHICA | 1995年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：145 / 157
页数：13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Judicial Reason as a Model for Public Reason: Rawls, Dworkin and the Law
    Melero de la Torre, Mariano C.
    ENRAHONAR-QUADERNS DE FILOSOFIA, 2009, (43): : 83 - 109
  • [2] DWORKIN, RAWLS AND REALITY
    LOUGHLIN, M
    HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 1995, 3 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [3] The Habermas/Rawls debate
    Baynes, Kenneth
    CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL THEORY, 2021, 20 (SUPPL 3) : 140 - 143
  • [4] DWORKIN AND THE RAWLS' INTERPRETATION AS LEGAL PHILOSOPHY
    Rohling, Marcos
    LEX HUMANA, 2012, 4 (02) : 102 - 124
  • [5] The Habermas-Rawls Debate
    Humphries, James
    PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2021, 72 (01): : 249 - 251
  • [6] The Habermas-Rawls Debate
    Gosselin-Tapp, Jerome
    PHILOSOPHIQUES, 2019, 46 (02): : 458 - 463
  • [7] The Habermas-Rawls debate
    Gledhill, James
    CONSTELLATIONS-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL AND DEMOCRATIC THEORY, 2020, 27 (03): : 553 - 555
  • [8] Rawls and Habermas on Political Culture
    Langbehn, Claus
    PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH, 2015, 122 (02): : 458 - 476
  • [9] Anti-foundationalism in Rawls and Dworkin
    Papaefthymiou, Sophie
    ARCHIV FUR RECHTS- UND SOZIALPHILOSOPHIE, 2020, 106 (01): : 29 - 43
  • [10] The Habermas-Rawls Debate
    Humphries, James
    PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2022, 72 (01): : 249 - 251
12345