Does home blood pressure monitoring improve patient outcomes? A systematic review comparing home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control and patient outcomes

被引:33
|
作者
Breaux-Shropshire, Tonya L. [1 ,2 ]
Judd, Eric [1 ]
Vucovich, Lee A. [3 ]
Shropshire, Toneyell S. [4 ]
Singh, Sonal [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Vasc Biol & Hypertens Program, Cardiovasc Dis, 933 19th St South, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[2] Vet Adm, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Lister Hill Lib, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[4] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Phys Therapy, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
关键词
ABPM; HBPM; OBPM; randomized control trials;
D O I
10.2147/IBPC.S49205
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective: Our objective was to compare the clinical effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on blood pressure (BP) control and patient outcomes. Design: A systematic review was conducted. We also appraised the methodological quality of studies. Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL). Inclusion criteria: Randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, observational studies, and case-control studies published in English from any year to present that describe HBPM and 24-hour ABPM and report on systolic and/or diastolic BP and/or heart attack, stroke, kidney failure and/or all-cause mortality for adult patients. Due to the nature of the question, studies with only untreated patients were not considered. Results: Of 1,742 titles and abstractions independently reviewed by two reviewers, 137 studies met predetermined criteria for evaluation. Nineteen studies were identified as relevant and included in the paper. The common themes were that HBPM and ABPM correlated with cardiovascular events and mortality, and targeting HBPM or ABPM resulted in similar outcomes. Associations between BP measurement type and mortality differed by study population. Both the low sensitivity of office blood pressure monitoring (OBPM) to detect optimal BP control by ABPM and the added association of HBPM with cardiovascular mortality supported the routine use of HBPM in clinical practice. There was insufficient data to determine the benefit of using HBPM as a measurement standard for BP control. Conclusion: HBPM encourages patient-centered care and improves BP control and patient outcomes. Given the limited number of studies with both HBPM and ABPM, these measurement types should be incorporated into the design of randomized clinical trials within hypertensive populations.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic review: does continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring improve patient outcomes?
    Rook, William
    Vyas, Hrushi
    Yeung, Joyce
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 123 (04) : E505 - E506
  • [2] Studies comparing ambulatory blood pressure and home blood pressure on cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes: a systematic review
    Shimbo, Daichi
    Abdalla, Marwah
    Falzon, Louise
    Townsend, Raymond R.
    Muntner, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 10 (03) : 224 - 234
  • [3] Does home blood pressure monitoring improve blood pressure-related outcomes in people living with chronic kidney disease? A systematic review
    Carey, Nathan P.
    Curtis, Ffion
    Eisenbeisz, McKenna L.
    Akbari, Sadaf
    Sambharia, Meenakshi
    Jalal, Diana I.
    Wilkinson, Thomas J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2024, 26 (04): : 314 - 329
  • [4] A comparison of office blood pressure, telemedical home blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Hoffmann-Petersen, N.
    Tambo, T.
    Pedersen, E. Bjerregaard
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 573 - 573
  • [5] Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Comparison of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Home (Self) Monitoring Of Blood Pressure
    Townsend, Raymond R.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2020, 76 (06) : 1667 - 1673
  • [6] Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review
    Hodgkinson, J.
    Mant, J.
    Martin, U.
    Guo, B.
    Hobbs, F. D. R.
    Deeks, J. J.
    Heneghan, C.
    Roberts, N.
    McManus, R. J.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342
  • [7] Use of Home Monitoring to Improve Blood Pressure Control
    Hill, James R.
    Conner, Ruth S.
    [J]. JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2016, 12 (10): : E423 - E425
  • [8] Improving patient outcomes with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in elderly with hypertension
    Frost, BK
    Hajjar, IM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2006, 18 (03): : 104 - 115
  • [9] Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Heart Transplant Recipients: Comparison with Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
    Ambrosi, Pierre
    Kreitmann, Bernard
    Habib, Gilbert
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 97 (03) : 363 - 367
  • [10] Postpartum Home Blood Pressure Monitoring A Systematic Review
    Steele, Dale W.
    Adam, Gaelen P.
    Saldanha, Ian J.
    Kanaan, Ghid
    Zahradnik, Michael L.
    Danilack-Fekete, Valery A.
    Stuebe, Alison M.
    Peahl, Alex F.
    Chen, Kenneth K.
    Balk, Ethan M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (02): : 285 - 295