A DOUBLE-BLIND DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY OF AMLODIPINE IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE ANGINA-PECTORIS

被引:11
|
作者
COCCO, G
ALFIERO, R
机构
[1] REHABIL CTR SOLBAKLIN,DEPT CARDIOL,RHEINFELDEN,SWITZERLAND
[2] INST GEN MED & CLIN THERAPY,FERRARA,ITALY
关键词
AMLODIPINE; CALCIUM ANTAGONIST; ANGINA PECTORIS;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059864
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Sixty patients (31 male, 29 female) were studied in a 4-week double-blind parallel dose-response study. Patients received amlodipine 1.25 mg (n = 12), 2.5 mg (n = 12), 5 mg (n = 12), 10 mg (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) once a day. Anti-anginal efficacy was assessed by sequential treadmill testing 24 h post-dose, frequency of anginal attacks and consumption of nitroglycerin, patient and investigator assessment. In the analysis of the final vs baseline total exercise time, the difference between those on amlodipine and those on placebo was significant (P < 0.01), (all doses). Mean total exercise time increased by 24% in the amlodipine 10 mg group compared with a 20% decrease in the placebo group. The time to onset of angina increased by 37% in the amlodipine 10 mg group, compared with a 16.5% decrease in the placebo group. Differences were statistically significant for the 1.25, 5 and 10 mg amlodipine groups vs placebo. ST-segment charges and rate-pressure product were not affected significantly. There was a statistically significant difference in angina attack frequency and nitroglycerin tablet consumption (P < 0.05) for all dose groups vs placebo. The majority of patients receiving amlodipine reported improvement in angina symptoms. Side-effects were frequent but mild and dose-related. Amlodipine has significant anti-anginal efficacy. The mechanisms underlying the anti-ischaemic effects of amlodipine are still under discussion. © 1991 The European Society of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 174
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A 4-WEEK DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY OF AMLODIPINE IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE EXERTIONAL ANGINA-PECTORIS
    TAYLOR, SH
    LEE, P
    JACKSON, N
    COCCO, G
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1989, 118 (05) : 1133 - 1134
  • [2] LONG-TERM DOUBLE-BLIND EVALUATION OF AMLODIPINE AND NADOLOL IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE EXERTIONAL ANGINA-PECTORIS
    SINGH, S
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [3] DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY ON EFFECTIVE ORAL DOSE OF HEXOBENDINE IN ANGINA-PECTORIS
    BENDA, L
    HAMMERL, H
    KLAUSGRABER, F
    [J]. WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1972, 84 (46) : 749 - +
  • [4] A DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY ON METOPROLOL IN ANGINA-PECTORIS
    UUSITALO, A
    KEYRILAINEN, O
    JOHNSSON, G
    [J]. ANNALS OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1981, 13 : 54 - 57
  • [5] PRACTOLOL IN ANGINA-PECTORIS - DOUBLE-BLIND ERGOMETRIC STUDY
    BACKMAN, H
    MARTIKAINEN, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1974, 6 (06): : 347 - 355
  • [6] DOUBLE-BLIND CROSSOVER STUDY OF DIPHENYLHYDANTOIN IN ANGINA-PECTORIS
    TAYLOR, CR
    [J]. CHEST, 1974, 66 (04) : 422 - 427
  • [7] A NORDIC MULTICENTER DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY OF METROPROLOL IN ANGINA-PECTORIS PATIENTS
    HAMMERSHOY, O
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1982, 31 (06): : 1026 - 1034
  • [8] Acute dose-response, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of lercanidipine in patients with angina pectoris
    Acanfora, D
    Gheorghiade, M
    Rotiroti, D
    Trojano, L
    Rengo, G
    Furgi, G
    Papa, A
    Picone, C
    Nicolino, A
    Odierna, L
    Rengo, F
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2000, 61 (05): : 255 - 265
  • [9] RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF GALLOPAMIL AND PROPRANOLOL IN STABLE ANGINA-PECTORIS
    KHURMI, NS
    OHARA, MJ
    BOWLES, MJ
    SUBRAMANIAN, VB
    RAFTERY, EB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1984, 53 (06): : 684 - 688
  • [10] EFFECTS OF RANDOMIZATION TO DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO THERAPY IN STABLE ANGINA-PECTORIS
    SHAPIRO, W
    CARROLL, J
    PARK, J
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1977, 25 (01): : A47 - A47