Perceptions of Nonprofits and For-Profit Social Enterprises: Current Trends and Future Implications

被引:6
|
作者
Albrecht, Kate [1 ]
Varkey, Sapna [1 ]
Colville, Kathleen [1 ]
Clerkin, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
nonprofit organization; for-profit social enterprise; public perception; future leaders;
D O I
10.18666/JNEL-2018-V8-I3-9134
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Nonprofits and for-profits use the term entrepreneurial to describe the mind-sets, behaviors, and strategies they employ to achieve organizational goals. Relatively little analysis has been conducted about public perception of the differences between nonprofit organizations (NPOs) and for-profit social enterprises (FPSEs) and how these perceptions influence the behavior of potential investors, donors, employees, and volunteers. This study explores how Gen Z respondents (those born in the early 1990s) perceive NPOs and FPSEs along multiple dimensions, including values, motivations, and organizational culture. Overall, Gen Z young people perceive NPOs and FPSEs as having distinct orientations to expressive roles (values and social welfare goals) and affiliative roles (inclusive community engagement), but perceive NPOs and FPSEs as more likely to have overlapping approaches to instrumental roles (getting the work done). Our results identify some perceptions that align with a priori assumptions, as well as views that indicate new ideas about the NPO and FPSE sectors. These results have implications for leaders of all types of organizations, but especially for leaders of FPSEs who may seek to assert their expressive and affiliative similarities with their nonprofit peers.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 276
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do Nonprofit and For-Profit Social Enterprises Differ in Financing?
    Guo, Baorong
    Peng, Shuyang
    [J]. VOLUNTAS, 2020, 31 (03): : 521 - 532
  • [2] Do Nonprofit and For-Profit Social Enterprises Differ in Financing?
    Baorong Guo
    Shuyang Peng
    [J]. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2020, 31 : 521 - 532
  • [3] Retaining the social goal: role of path creation in for-profit social enterprises
    Sarma, Sushanta Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT HISTORY, 2020, 26 (01) : 77 - 98
  • [4] The not-for-profit and for-profit arts: Current collaborations and future prospects - Introduction
    Pankratz, DB
    Gibson, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY, 1999, 29 (02): : 75 - 78
  • [5] Attention allocation to multiple goals: The case of for-profit social enterprises
    Stevens, Robin
    Moray, Nathalie
    Bruneel, Johan
    Clarysse, Bart
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (07) : 1006 - 1016
  • [6] Attitude Toward Social Enterprises: A Comparison between For-Profit and Social Enterprise Employees
    Choi, Eunsoo
    Kim, Eunji
    Kim, Inji
    Choi, Incheol
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [7] Balancing Competing Logics in For-Profit Social Enterprises: A Need for Hybrid Governance
    Bruneel, Johan
    Moray, Nathalie
    Stevens, Robin
    Fassin, Yves
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2016, 7 (03) : 263 - 288
  • [8] How to explain social innovation in elderly care services: The role of for-profit and non-profit social enterprises
    Guzman, Carmen
    Santos, Francisco J.
    Savall, Teresa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [9] A longitudinal comparison of capital structure between young for-profit social and commercial enterprises
    Siqueira, Ana Cristina O.
    Guenster, Nadja
    Vanacker, Tom
    Crucke, Saskia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2018, 33 (02) : 225 - 240
  • [10] The Impact of Peer-Influence: How Does Social Network Endorsement Affect Nonprofits and For-Profit Companies?
    Tofighi, Maryam
    Mazaheri, Ebrahim
    Anderson, Jeffrey E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT & PUBLIC SECTOR MARKETING, 2022, 34 (02) : 177 - 203