Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems A review for clinicians

被引:0
|
作者
Toumbis, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Chest Dis Sotiria, Resp Dept 6, 152 Mesogeion Ave, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
来源
PNEUMON | 2016年 / 29卷 / 04期
关键词
Electronic nicotine delivery systems; E-cigarettes; Epidemiology; Hazards and benefits;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The prevalence of the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) has increased rapidly in the past few years. In the absence of clear negative health messages, the decision of adults on whether or not to initiate ENDS use is influenced by various factors, including the pervasive promotion of ENDS as being effective in smoking cessation and a safe alternative to tobacco, which are unsubstantiated claims. The appeal of advertisements promoting ENDS as an enjoyable lifestyle choice and a high-tech product influences the choice of young people. Thus, the most common reasons for ENDS use in adults are its perceived safety and its efficacy as a cigarette cessation aid. Curiosity, flavors, and peer influence have been identified as the top reasons for ENDS use in adolescents and young people. Although ENDS are generally considered as a single product class, the systems constitute a diverse group with differences in the production and delivery of the various agents. The composition of the aerosol generated by ENDS depends on several factors, including, the electronic liquid constituents, the ENDS features, and user behavior. Currently available data indicate that ENDS aerosols are not harmless, especially with respect to body systems that are sensitive to various toxic effects. The literature on the effects of ENDS on the various body systems is sparse and marked by a lack of standardization in methods. The long-term effects of ENDS are as yet unknown. Studies of short-term exposure to ENDS aerosol document several biological and functional effects on the respiratory, cardiovascular, immune, and central nervous systems. At least under certain conditions, ENDS have been shown to deliver physiologically active quantities of nicotine, and can thus produce and/or maintain nicotine dependence. The current evidence is sufficient to justify cautioning pregnant women, women of reproductive age, children and adolescents about the hazards of ENDS use, because of the potential for fetal and adolescent nicotine exposure to have long-term consequences for brain development. Passive exposure to ENDS aerosol has not been well studied because ENDS are relatively new products, but it is of concern, because of its potential adverse health effects for people who are involuntarily exposed. The majority of relevant studies concluded that passive exposure to ENDS aerosol may indeed pose a health risk. The evidence for the effectiveness of ENDS as a method for quitting or reducing tobacco smoking is limited and of low quality. Some studies demonstrated a significant relationship between ENDS use and increases in smoking cessation, while others found no association or a negative one. The findings of prospective studies on adolescent and young adult populations suggest that ENDS use is a clear and consistent indicator of the likelihood of subsequent initiation of cigarette and other combustible tobacco product use, at ages spanning from early adolescence through emerging adulthood.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 333
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review
    Glasser, Allison M.
    Collins, Lauren
    Pearson, Jennifer L.
    Abudayyeh, Haneen
    Niaura, Raymond S.
    Abrams, David B.
    Villanti, Andrea C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (02) : E33 - E66
  • [2] Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
    不详
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2015, 136 (05) : 1018 - 1026
  • [3] Electronic nicotine delivery systems
    Blasi, Francesco
    Ward, Brian
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 45 (03) : 858 - 859
  • [4] Injuries associated with electronic nicotine delivery systems: A systematic review
    Vyncke, Tom
    De Wolf, Edward
    Hoeksema, Henk
    Verbelen, Jozef
    De Coninck, Petra
    Buncamper, Marlon
    Monstrey, Stan
    Claes, Karel E. Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2020, 89 (04): : 783 - 791
  • [5] Prevalence of electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoong, Sze Lin
    Hall, Alix
    Leonard, Alecia
    McCrabb, Sam
    Wiggers, John
    d'Espaignet, Edouard Tursan
    Stockings, Emily
    Gouda, Hebe
    Fayokun, Ranti
    Commar, Alison
    Prasad, Vinayak M.
    Paul, Christine
    Oldmeadow, Christopher
    Chai, Li Kheng
    Thompson, Bruce
    Wolfenden, Luke
    [J]. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 6 (09): : E661 - E673
  • [6] Clinical pharmacology of nicotine in electronic nicotine delivery systems
    Peruga, Armando
    Eissenberg, Thomas
    [J]. WHO STUDY GROUP ON TOBACCO PRODUCT REGULATION: REPORT ON THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS OF TOBACCO PRODUCT REGULATION: SEVENTH REPORT OF A WHO STUDY GROUP, 2019, 1015 : 31 - 74
  • [7] Commentary: Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
    Sissung, Tristan M.
    Figg, William D.
    [J]. FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2022, 45 (03) : 202 - 205
  • [8] Electronic nicotine delivery systems and/or electronic non-nicotine delivery systems for tobacco smoking cessation or reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    El Dib, Regina
    Suzumura, Erica A.
    Akl, Elie A.
    Gomaa, Huda
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Chang, Yaping
    Prasad, Manya
    Ashoorion, Vahid
    Heels-Ansdell, Diane
    Maziak, Wasim
    Guyatt, Gordon
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (02):
  • [9] A scoping review of studies on the health impact of electronic nicotine delivery systems
    Hajat, Cother
    Stein, Emma
    Shantikumar, Saran
    Niaura, Raymond
    Ferrara, Pietro
    Polosa, Riccardo
    [J]. INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (01) : 241 - 268
  • [10] A scoping review of studies on the health impact of electronic nicotine delivery systems
    Cother Hajat
    Emma Stein
    Saran Shantikumar
    Raymond Niaura
    Pietro Ferrara
    Riccardo Polosa
    [J]. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2022, 17 : 241 - 268